Acts 1:9; Acts 4:15; Acts 7:55, 56; 2 Corinthians 4:3 - 7
My thought was to dwell on the fact that we are living in a cloudless dispensation, in contrast to the previous one which, as we all recognise, was marked by the presence of a cloud. The first mention we have of a cloud is, I think, in Genesis 9. It is a very simple thought that a cloud has the tendency to shut off the light and influence of the sun, yet in that passage, although there may be the shutting off from the creation of the light of the sun, there is at the same time in the presence of the cloud the testimony to God's faithfulness. Although the shining of His face -- the shining of His glory in the face of Christ -- was for the moment hidden, there was at the same time the testimony to His faithfulness; that is, there was an indication in the face of the cloud of what was concealed behind it. Abraham was called out from the midst of the gentiles by the God of glory; that is, glory was in the mind of God in calling him out. But that glory was to be concealed. Hence when God takes up the people in His faithfulness, the cloud disappears, that is to say, God's glory was there. His glory existed, I need not say. Glory is not an afterthought with God. Glory refers to what God is in His nature, and His glory was present at all His operations; but in calling out Abraham, God indicated that there should be a particular family in connection with which that glory should be displayed, and in undertaking to bring to pass that which He had in His mind in calling out Abraham, the cloud is apparent. The cloud appeared even before the people left the land of Egypt, there was the presence of the divine glory -- only God had arranged a means
of concealing it. He had arranged His own means for concealing that glory, but it was there. It was there as a guide to the people, and it was there as a protector of the people: its effectiveness on their behalf was fully demonstrated to them. And then they were baptised to it. They were baptised unto Moses, we are told, "in the cloud and in the sea". 1 Corinthians 10:2 That is what God intended the people for; they were to be His glory, and they were baptised to it. They were baptised in it, we are told. Well now, as thus committed to it, it becomes their guide in the wilderness until they had opportunity to show their appreciation of it. What I mean by showing their appreciation of it is that they should build something for it, that they should prepare an abode for it. As we read of David, who fully expresses the sentiments of God's people in regard to His glory, "I will not give sleep to mine eyes, or slumber to mine eyelids, until I find out a place for the Lord, an habitation for the mighty God of Jacob". Psalm 132:4 And then he invited Jehovah to enter into His rest, He and the ark of His strength. Now that was exactly what the people undertook to do in the wilderness.
Nothing can be more interesting to us than the wilderness position. The wilderness is divided into three sections, as I understand it. The first section has reference to pure grace; God establishes on the banks of the Red Sea an economy of pure grace. The people, in the full sense of the deliverance that has been achieved for them, celebrate Jehovah as a man of war, and they set out to journey in the wilderness under pure grace. They murmur; there is no complaint on the part of Jehovah. The next section has reference to the divine system; the believer is in the wilderness in connection with God's system of things. A system of things is established here in which divine order is to be displayed, and in which the will of God must be supreme. That is,
the children of Israel are here in relation to the tabernacle. And then, finally, the believer is seen in relation to the Spirit. From Numbers 21 to the Jordan refers to a people here as possessing God's Spirit.
The people, now, as set up in presence of the glory in the cloud -- baptised unto Moses in it -- and in the full appreciation of Jehovah as their Deliverer, would build Him an habitation. You will never effect anything for God unless your heart is established in grace. Unless you apprehend that God has intervened for you in the Lord Jesus Christ -- in the death and resurrection of Christ, and in the gift of the Spirit -- you will never really effect anything for God. As in the light of His grace, your heart at liberty in the presence of what God has done for you, then you are able to do something, and the people proposed to build God a habitation. He accepts the proposition -- He accepts their offer, and they build a habitation. What I want to point out is, the material was all provided by the people. Moses did not bring down from Sinai any of the material; all he brought down were the tables of the covenant; all the material for the structure had to be provided by the people. Moses brought down the pattern of the tabernacle, he brought down the light -- the mind of God. That is what the apostles did. The mind of God has been brought to us by the apostles, but you must have the operation of the Spirit if you are to have the material. As I said, Moses did not bring down the material. He brought down the light, the pattern of the structure, and the people supplied the material willingly, as we are told.
The people having now supplied everything that was requisite for the building of the tabernacle, everything was formed according to the pattern, and by the hand of one divinely endued with wisdom. So the structure was made in accordance with God's
mind, and reared up, and then, we are told, the cloud rested upon it. That is, God is pleased to connect His glory with the structure. The delight God had in it was such that He filled it in such wise that even Moses could not go inside the tabernacle.
The glory filled it, but it was a glory cloud. It was not manifested glory; it was concealed glory. But the glory was there. And when we come to the New Testament, when He appeared, He was in His own Person the Tabernacle -- for that was really what Christ was; in His own Person He represented all that God had in His mind to establish -- on the mount of Transfiguration, when Peter would have made three tabernacles: one for Christ, one for Moses, and one for Elias, God, as it were, says, 'There is only one Tabernacle' and the cloud immediately appears. God intimated that He could not connect His glory with Moses or Elias, as such; if the glory cloud is to appear, if it is to rest upon anyone, it must be upon the Son. The Son, Christ, is the true Tabernacle. Under God's eye, He represented the tabernacle in the wilderness, and hence, the cloud appears. This time it was a bright cloud, pointing, I daresay, to the unique situation; that is, the Son was there. But with all that, though the Lord Jesus Christ Himself was present, the glory was still concealed; the cloud was there. It was a bright one, as I have said, but nevertheless a cloud.
The Father was within that cloud. Not now Jehovah's voice, but the Father's voice is heard, intimating the supreme thought in the glory, namely, that God revealed, is revealed as a Father with a Son. That is the idea of the revelation of God. "No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him". John 1:18 The revelation of God signifies that He is to be known in the character of a Father with a Son. That relationship was spoken
of in the cloud. The relationship was there, but nevertheless it was shrouded in a cloud.
The cloud idea continued until every link was broken with Israel. The Person of Christ here drew the Father's voice out of the cloud, the relationship was there; but the cloud remained. And so, as the Lord was about to ascend to heaven, you might say, surely the cloud period is now over, but no, it is not. There was one element in God that had to be vindicated, and that was His patience. Hence the cloud still remained, so that when Christ goes up from Bethany -- or rather from Olivet -- we are told, a cloud receives Him. A cloud -- that is, He is cut off from the view of Israel by a cloud, pointing to the fact that God in patience lingered with Israel, that He would still hold out His hand to Israel, the universal character of the testimony had to be held in abeyance; the full universal display of God's own mind had to be held in abeyance. So you find that while Christ is hidden by the cloud, the twelve continued the ministry in Israel. They continued it to Israel on account of Israel's privileges, and while the special national privileges of Israel were recognised, you could not have the full, clear shining of the sun, because if the sun shines full it must influence all the creation below, not a part of it.
Psalm 19 speaks about the tabernacle set in the heavens for the sun, and he comes out of his chamber, we are told, as a strong man to run a race. And the race is the circuit of the heavens, and all the creation below is affected by it. But if a cloud comes in, there is only a partial shining. There may be a total cutting off of the sun's light, or a partial shining. Now I take it that Israel as it stood was itself the cloud. The recognition of Israel's national privileges, as giving it priority over all other nations, necessarily prevented the shining of the sun. We all know what an eclipse is, or a partial eclipse, and what I understand
by Israel's position, as it stood in the early part of the Acts, is that it partially eclipsed the full shining of God in Christ; but God's overtures to Israel, His lingerings in grace, only brought out the wonderful character of His patience. The patience of God is a great testimony of the Old Testament. The prophets stand for His patience. And so His patience lingered in His overtures to Israel through the ministry of the twelve.
Now, what I wanted to show is that in the ministry of Stephen you have the way made clear for the full shining of the light. In the end of Acts 5 you find the ministry of the twelve continued in the temple, and from house to house -- the house -- to -- house character having reference to the activity proper to christianity, but at the same time the link maintained with Israel in the temple. When you come to Stephen you come to one who is not an apostle, he had not special ministry to Israel. What marked Stephen was that he was full of the Holy Spirit. He was full, and if you get a man full of the Holy Spirit there is no part of that man dark at all; Stephen, as filled with the Spirit, was not in any way darkened by the influence of his national relationship. He was full of the Spirit, and what marks a man that is full of the Spirit? He is luminous; there is no part dark. Mat a great many of us suffer from is partial eclipse. If you recognise a nation or a section of a nation -- if you recognise anything on earth, if you give anything on earth a special preference, there is a partial eclipse; for God has no connection with anything earthly. I could enlarge upon that in regard to Jerusalem, but all I wish to emphasise is that in the death of Stephen every link was cut with the nation. And it was the death of one who was filled with the Spirit; in Stephen there was a perfect ministry of the Spirit. If you get a vessel full, it is full, and Stephen was filled with the Spirit. And his face shone, it was
as it were, a full moon. A full moon signifies that the moon is in the full light of the sun, there is nothing interfering between it and the sun. Now, I take it that Stephen was in the full light of Christ in heaven. You may ask, Why with Christ in heaven? Because the face of Stephen was a heavenly face. It was not the reflection of any of the glory set in Jerusalem; it was as the face of an angel. An angel represents several thoughts, but there is one thought that the idea of an angel stands for, that cannot be denied, and that is, he is a heavenly being. The fact is that the term 'heavenly' is used to designate angels. We read of "a multitude of the heavenly host", Luke 2:13 meaning a multitude of angels -- praising God at the birth of Christ. Now, Stephen's face was like the face of one of these. The cloud has gone as far as Stephen is concerned. The Holy Spirit had come out of heaven; and Stephen was full of the Holy Spirit and his face shone like the face of an angel.
What a wonderful testimony to that council! There was the servant of Christ full of the Spirit -- full of the Spirit -- without a thought of animosity in his heart; without any vindictiveness at all; he was there in the full energy of the Spirit of Christ, in the presence of the council. I say what a speaker he was, but what an unappreciative audience he had! There was not an atom of sympathy there. There was one of the most perfect addresses conceivable, and it received not an atom of sympathy. But there he stood, the representative of a heavenly Christ, in the presence of an earthly council -- a council that represented the government of God from the Red Sea onward to that moment. It represented all that had been deposited in Israel; it had the responsibility of it. And there was Stephen, the representative of a heavenly Christ, bearing testimony. And what kind of testimony? He says, "the God of glory". That was his text. He began with God, the God of
glory. That is, the glory had been there from Abraham onward (though veiled in a cloud) and Stephen outlines the history, as it were, of that glory in its relation with Israel, and faithfully depicts the inveterate character of their hatred, from start to finish, to everything of God. Take Joseph, or Moses -- each person represented the activities of the glory. Although not displayed, although hid behind the veil, nevertheless the glory was there, and Israel refused it, until finally it appeared in the Person of Christ, "Of whom", he says, "ye have been now the betrayers and murderers". Acts 7:52 That was his address. That was his testimony. "And they gnashed on him with their teeth ... and cast him out of the city". Acts 7:54 They stoned Stephen, but then, what kind of man did they stone? A man whose face shone like the face of an angel; a man who called on the name of the Lord; a man who prayed for them even while they stoned him.
But now I want to dwell on the well -- known passage, that he "looked up stedfastly into heaven". There is no idea of a cloud now. The cloud no longer conceals the Lord from Stephen. The cloud received Him out of the apostles' sight, we are told, but Stephen looks right through the heavens, "and saw the glory of God". That glory in the cloud, through God's patience and long -- suffering, had been with Israel, but is now in heaven, and in the company of Jesus. "He, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God". That is what Stephen saw, and he dies. Stephen succumbs to the stones of his murderers, but the light reflected -- that wonderful heavenly light reflected in his face and in his spirit -- remains upon earth. There was one standing by, holding the clothes of the murderers, a young man. God takes up young men; and here was one who was holding the clothes of the murderers
of a martyr of Jesus; he saw what happened, and I take it, the impression never left him. I think the Lord alluded to that when He said, "it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks!" Acts 9:55. I think that the Lord alluded to the effect of the light which had entered Saul's heart. He was resisting it, but he was to become, ere long, a witness to it. Hence, I have referred to Stephen as making way for the present situation.
Now it is most important at the present time that our souls should be established in the full light of the present economy. The present economy -- the christian economy -- was not properly established until Paul's ministry was fully developed. Until the link was finally severed with Israel, as I said, there was the cloud state of things where the light was shining, but where nevertheless, it was not complete; there was not the full shining of the sun. When you come to Paul's ministry you have the establishment of what I call the world -- wide christian economy. It is a wonderful economy into which we gentiles have been introduced. Peter admitted the gentiles into the christian system, but now, what was it into which he admitted them? Acts 9 shows us a heavenly kingdom established in the Person of Christ, and chapter 10, the four -- cornered sheet let down from heaven, representing the mind of heaven -- that the mind of heaven is sympathetic with the whole race of man. Peter is brought in sympathy with that, and he opens the door to the gentiles. He opens the door formally, by baptism, and admits them into the heavenly system. He admits them into all that is unfolded in chapters 9 and 10, and then we have Paul's ministry. It is very interesting to see that, in opening this subject to the Corinthians, he introduces it in connection with himself as a minister. What was called in question at Corinth was the minister. The best possible way, let me say
to discredit the ministry is to discredit the minister; if you discredit the minister, you will discredit the ministry without opposing it. Now that is what they were doing at Corinth, and what the apostle establishes is that what his ministry was, he was. And who made him that? Jesus could say of Himself when asked as to His Person, I am "altogether that which I also say to you". John 8:25 In His own Person He was altogether what He said, and Paul can say, "God ... hath made us able ministers of the new testament". 2 Corinthians 3:6 That is to say, Paul does not assume to be what he said in himself; but God had made him a competent minister of the new covenant, and the Corinthians were to understand that. They did not see that what the enemy was aiming at was the ministry; he was aiming at Christ. The enemy would not dare to oppose Christ at Corinth, but he did dare to oppose Paul; the enemy did not dare to discredit the Person of Christ, but he did dare to discredit Paul.
The apostle seizes the opportunity and without aggrandising himself he shows that God had made him a competent minister. But he was not a minister in the letter, that is, he was not a minister in the first covenant; he was not a minister according to the letter, he was a minister of the spirit of the covenant. It is a wonderful thing to get a hold of the spiritual import of all that happened in the incarnation and death of Christ. What we want to become accustomed to is to get spiritual ideas. Paul says, "Not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life". 2 Corinthians 3:6 And then he says, "the Lord is the Spirit, but where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty". 2 Corinthians 3:17 That is, where the Lord has His place, Judaism and Jewish principles have no power; they gender to bondage, the Spirit of the Lord genders to liberty. And what does that liberty involve? Why, that we have liberty to love one another! Surely the spirit of the covenant
is love. Analyse John 13 -- what a spirit that was! That was not the letter, it was the Spirit. It was the new commandment. The new commandment is the new commandment; that is, it is something wholly new. The true light is the activity of love amongst us, so that, where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty to love one another and to care for one another. But there is more; there is liberty of access to God. Now that is the greatest privilege that could possibly be accorded to a people upon earth. You remember the two things that Moses desired; the first was that he might see Jehovah's glory, and that was denied him, and the second was that he might enter the land of Canaan, and that was denied him. Now, these two great privileges are given to us. We have liberty of access to God, and have liberty to enter Canaan. We have liberty to approach God in His holy nature, and we have liberty to be in His sphere, in His home, in the family circle.
Reverting for a moment to the types, there was not only the cloud over the tabernacle in which the glory was, but even when the high priest was admitted once a year to the holiest of all, he had to go in in a cloud of incense, "that he die not". Leviticus 16:13 That is to say, all that which spoke of God revealed in Christ -- all that spoke of the Person of Christ, the ark of the covenant, and the cherubim, and so on -- all had to be shrouded with thick smoke -- with incense -- with a cloud; otherwise the high priest would have been smitten. What you now see is that the cloud is no longer required. "Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh ... let us draw near". Hebrews 10:19
The difficulty now is, that with us the spirit of Moses is absent. If Moses were amongst us, what a
delight it would be to him to see the way open into the holiest! It is dedicated by His blood, but remember it is a living way. You may say it is through the death of Christ, but it is not only that, it is a living way; to enter the holiest requires power. It requires power, but there it is; the door is open and the apostle exhorts us to draw near. You may say, what do we draw near to? To God. We have liberty to draw near to God, and as we draw near, what do we find? By the Spirit, we are enabled to see and understand the means by which God brings to pass every thought of His. That is what I understand by it, that already the assembly is in the secret of the means by which God effects all His purposes. You see not only that God is Almighty, as He declared Himself to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but you see in Christ the means by which all is brought to pass. Hence, if you want to be enlightened as to the mind of God, you have to draw near to God. You see that it is all carried out in holiness. Unflinching holiness was to mark everything within the veil.
All I want to bring out is that christian liberty is toward one another, and there is liberty toward God. We are not now bound by Jewish principles, we are in the full light of the heavenly system; so that the apostle says, "We all, looking on the glory of the Lord, with unveiled face". 2 Corinthians 3:18 That is really the holiest. The glory is to be beheld; it is all there in the face of Christ. Stephen saw it, "and Jesus". All the divine glory is in the countenance of a Man -- it is a wonderful thought, not of an angel, but in the countenance of a Man. Beholding that, we "are transformed ... from glory to glory, even as by the Lord the Spirit". 2 Corinthians 3:18 What I wish to add is, the apostle shows in chapter 4 that what he preached was really that. He preached the glory of God; not simply the God of glory, but the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. In other words, the gospel that Paul preached
was the full shining out of God's nature in the Person of Christ. He says the enemy blinds the minds of the unbelieving "so that the radiancy of the glad tidings of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine forth for them". The gospel that has come to us has come from Paul and it is the gospel of the glory -- not simply a partial shining of the glory, but the full shining out of God's nature; and that is seen in the Person of Christ. And Paul can say that it has shone into our hearts -- it is a wonderful place for it to shine into -- "for the shining forth of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ".
Now, I take it that that is what we are to be instructed in. If we are to come out in the future "having the glory", we have to be formed in it now. The gospel is intended to produce a vessel that will come out in the future having the glory; so that there is the shining out in the assembly, as we are told, "To him be glory in the assembly in Christ Jesus unto all generations of the age of ages". Ephesians 3:21
Hebrews 10:1 - 22
We cannot understand christianity until we see the kind of Man Christ was as taking human form here under God's eye. We have to see this before we can understand aright what christianity is: and this passage, it seems to me, would suggest what He was. His thought in becoming Man was to do God's will: "Lo, I come ... to do thy will, O God", He says, "a body hast thou prepared me". He answered in every way to God. He, in carrying out God's will, established a title to live down here, and not only so, but having established that, He becomes the sacrifice. Having established a title to live, and that publicly, He is eligible, or qualified to take man's place as sacrifice. All the perfection of Christ comes out under the eye of God. In the burnt -- offering the more the light shone in, the more His perfection shone out. It is not so with us. "The word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart". Hebrews 4:12 The word of God, turned in on us, discloses something very different from what was in Christ. The inner springs of Christ were all active Godward.
We see the order of man which is to remain in the presence of God, and we are to be formed after the will of God. When we think of man, we must go back to the garden of Eden. The moment the Lord appeared as Man here, every thought connected with man came into evidence. The problem to be solved was, Can this Man justify God in regard to every thought of God for man? The problem was infinitely
solved in Christ's walk here, so that we see Him as Man in perfection before God, in the midst of lawlessness and corruption, answering to the mind of God. That is man according to God. Christ is to do God's pleasure and bring in a new race -- a race with the law of God written in their minds and hearts, knowing forgiveness by the Spirit. In the Lord's birth we have the announcement, "good pleasure in men", Luke 2:14 indicating that it was a race God had in mind. The Lord sets it all forth in His own Person, and then removes the man who offended, and, in doing so, brings in a race or order of man according to God's pleasure. That indicates our position, so that on the one hand we have, "By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all". That is, sanctification is in the death of Christ, involving the removal of the lawless man; then it goes on in verse 15, "Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us". Man is retained before God, so that God's thought might be effectuated. We have the ministry of the Spirit; a ministry which forms man after Christ. In the old economy the sacrifice was inferior to the priest; in christianity they are equal. Necessarily the priest was superior to the offering, as the latter was a mere creature; now the Offerer and the Offering are equal. The Lord has brought in a new order of man. He has retained man before God; then the Spirit comes in, so that there is the ministry to secure God's end.
The Spirit is a witness to us that our sins and iniquities God will remember no more. In christianity there is even more than the writing of the law on the heart; we are the epistle of Christ. The saints are to be a transcript of Christ -- His letter. We delight in God's will; instead of its being a burden to us, it is a delight. An order of man is brought out like Christ. We are in accord with the death of Christ, as regards the removal of the man. Fellowship
involves that. We put forth our hand. No one can partake of the Supper for another. "By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ". We commit ourselves to it, and if so, we are transcripts of Christ, so that we fill out the rest of our time to God's will. There is great testimony in that to God. If we accept that, we are here in order that God would secure His thoughts in us, pending the establishment of things publicly, and there is a testimony to the order of man that God intends to retain before Him, and that here where sin reigns. The apostle describes it in Romans 8, "that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us…" Romans 8:4 That is a testimony for God, because it was what God intended in the world. He intended that Israel should walk in His will, so christianity takes the place of Israel, and the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled in us. God intended to secure something in Adam and that failed; and something in Israel, and that failed. "They like Adam have transgressed the covenant", Hosea 6:7. Christ takes it up and maintains it, and that is to be continued; nothing else will do for God.
This epistle is intended to establish in the assembly what is set forth in Christ in the gospels. The covenant is "I will". In general, Hebrews is not type and antitype, it is a book of contrasts; so when the types are alluded to, it is what they were literally. The will of God is the principle on which the new order of man will be brought in. The disciples felt in the Lord's presence that they did not know how to pray. What constitutes a man great is the way he acts in the presence of light. If there is an accession of light, how are we to act, how are we to be affected? The disciples were properly affected. "Teach us to pray", they say Luke 11:1. That is a right desire so the Lord says, "When ye pray, say, Father, thy name be hallowed; thy kingdom come". All His instruction
was on that principle, that His disciples might be established here in the will of God.
The will of God is a large subject. It is good to recognise it as a principle. The teaching of Romans 12 is that we might prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God. We are to prove it. It takes the whole christian course to prove it. The first thing involved in its application to us is that our wills are set aside. Instead of bringing pleasure they cause grief every day to God. The Lord is always unique; in every way that we correspond, there is some distinctive mark as to the Lord. The law is put into our minds, but He came with it. It is a great victory to have a generation like that in a scene of confusion. That is the testimony. In the millennial state of things the law will be written in the heart of Israel. The assembly on high will be the vessel of glory; there is the shining of glory in the face of Jesus in the assembly. The heavens declare the glory of God, as the psalmist says; nothing on earth declares it in the same way. The Lord comes down, and brings that principle to earth -- God's will. Everything in heaven is moved in accord with God's will; there is no deviation there -- that is the idea of glory. Now the Lord brought that to earth; He brought to earth what governed heaven, makes a complete circuit, and goes back to heaven. Now that is reflected in the assembly. And then Israel will be formed after the law, so that God's will is done on earth as in heaven. Now the testimony is all that, set forth in a contrary scene, witnessing to what will be seen publicly in the coming age. God's will must be vindicated on earth; only thus can the idea of approach be introduced.
God's will was in the Lord's heart. The fact that He says, "Lo, I come", shows that the disposition is there. It is the order of man. There are two things in Romans 8the Spirit of Christ, referring to the
order of man like Christ who is to continue on earth; and the Spirit of adoption, referring to what is in God's heart. The Lord as Man was the glory of God here. The ministry of the Spirit is to make us equal to that. All that man is is out of accord with what God is. Christ is God's glory, and the ministry of the Spirit is to bring us into accord with God's standard, so "we all, looking on the glory of the Lord, with unveiled face, are transformed". 2 Corinthians 3:18 In Romans 8 we see the Spirit of Christ, that is the Spirit of the Man; then the spirit of adoption is the Spirit of God's Son.
The secret of approach is that we know God. One may love God, and not have the title to approach. They loved God in the Old Testament, but had not the title to approach that we have. The measure of our approach is the measure of the revelation; it is the measure of liberty accorded to us. With christians it is the place Christ has, nothing short of it. There is our measure, but what God grants is another matter. On our side it follows on the ministry of the Spirit. On His side it is a question of sovereign pleasure -- what He wills. He is pleased to accord us the privilege, but it does not follow that, because we love God, we have title to approach; for the Old Testament saints had not the same privilege, though loving God. God determined privilege. He accords to us the privilege of entering the holiest, but we could not have it if He did not accord it to us. He is sovereign, and He discriminates. He accords to us the greatest privilege. God indicates His pleasure for us in that He has given Christ a place in heaven, as Man, as Forerunner. He went in, in Acts 1, but there was a cloud, there was no indication that the disciples were to go in. "Whom the heaven must receive", Peter said, "until the times of restitution of all things". Acts 3:21 "Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out,
when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; and he shall send Jesus Christ". But in Acts 7 the heavens are opened, and Stephen says, "I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God" Acts 7:56 -- there is indicated the mind of God for christians. "The heavens opened" -- I read there the title, the mind of God for us at the present moment. God must determine the place of every family, for He is the Father of whom every family in heaven and earth is named. Christ's place is our place now.
In the early part of Acts there is no idea of Christ being a Forerunner; He has gone into heaven, and to be concealed there, it would appear, until the time of restitution of all things; but in chapter 7 the heavens are opened, and that is the basis of christianity. The ground of the present dispensation is now laid in principle. Israel had the covenant, but we go further, we go within. Salvation will be when He comes out. In the early part of Acts we see the cities of refuge: "the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved". Acts 2:47 In Hebrews the external assembly is not in itself salvation for us; we require to lay hold of the heavenly position for salvation. It is insisted on in Hebrews. So it is the book of the opened heavens. We have no timidity in approach. It is in contrast to the tabernacle, for "the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest". Hebrews 9:8 It is "new" in contrast to the old; and "living" refers to the resurrection of Christ and the power of the Spirit in our hearts; so that, in approaching God, our affections are active. In the holiest we see the means by which God brings to pass universal blessing. We are in the secret of God; we see what Christ is as Man before God. The tables within the ark suggest Christ as doing God's will. It is all a question of Christ, so that there we learn the secret of God. What a thing to be in the secret of God -- to see the
Man by whom He effects this glorious system, a Man who had the law in His heart! Our priesthood is determined by our relation to Christ. What a thing to have a company of people with a pure heart -- like David's mighty men! As we enter the holiest, we are in accord with it -- we can lay our hand on the ark if we are formed according to it. Our exercises are in accord with the will of God.
In Hebrews we have not the assembly convened at all, except where it says, "not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is". Hebrews shows the privileges that belong to christianity; we get light as to those, but we have no directions as to the assembly convened, so I take it that entering the holiest is a matter of our soul's apprehension. The holiest was prominent in the wilderness. The sanctuary is a sanctified place set up; but with the holiest the idea is that there is nothing holier; hence it is the immediate presence of God. When God's thought is brought to pass, everything is in accord with the ark.
We have to learn to recognise God's will. The ark is the means by which God brings to pass every thought of His, and when this is accomplished, all is in accord with the ark, so that His will is done on earth as in heaven. David danced before the ark, it was his way of expressing his delight in the will of God. It is a grand thing to see the means by which God has brought to pass His thoughts -- then all is in accord with the ark, so that Christ is the centre of everything. The ark is the expression of God's will. Take a man in this city -- obscure, unseen, and desiring to do God's will -- what a thing that is for God, what a delight to Him!
Romans 6:1 - 23; Romans 8:12 - 16
J.T. I thought it would be helpful if we looked a little at the wilderness. It is important that we should see that it is not simply that we hasten through it, but that it is a sphere ordained in the ways of God in which He sets forth His testimony; so I thought it would be helpful if we saw how we get into it, and, as it is rightly understood, the end of it, and how we get out of it. The consideration of the typical books always helps in regard of detail, as to the position of the believer in reference to the wilderness, or the land, and I was thinking only today of the place the book of Numbers holds. I think it will be found that in the opening statement of each of the books is indicated the point of view of the book. In Exodus it is a question of the names of those who came out of Egypt; therefore, that is the point of view; Egypt is especially in view and the people in it and being brought out of it. In Leviticus it is: "And the Lord called unto Moses, and spake unto him out of the tabernacle", Leviticus 1:1 indicating what was in the tabernacle -- what resided in it; that is to say, how the people were to have to say to God in the tabernacle; whereas in Numbers God spake "in the wilderness ... in the tent of meeting". Numbers 1:1 So that it is not only as to what the tabernacle is inwardly, but what the tabernacle was in the wilderness. It is the wilderness position. I speak of that to show the setting of this chapter. Believers should see that as called out of the world it is not simply to go to heaven, but God designs a certain course here, and we are to stand in relationship to that, we are to see our place in relation to that, so that I thought this chapter
opens the subject, because it is the believer definitely accepting the death of Christ in his baptism. I do not know what the brethren have to say to that.
Rem. That is how we enter the wilderness, is it not?
Ques. Is death accepted because we come under the influence of the "One Man"? Romans 5:15
J.T. I think so. They "were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea". 1 Corinthians 10:2 I think it is of all moment that we should see that what we are committed to is baptism, and then what God can do with us as the truth is accepted, because this chapter is a question of our bodies.
Ques. You refer for the moment to the "yielding"?
Ques. When did the wilderness begin for Israel?
J.T. I thought it began upon the banks, when they had crossed the sea; they got to the other side of the sea from Egypt, but then it must be remembered that a whole year elapsed before the tabernacle was established.
Ques. Do you think that in that way it is from mount Sinai that we get the full thought of the wilderness, is that not important? Because God brought the people out to keep the feasts, but they never did keep the feasts.
J.T. The first thought was -- He said to Moses, 'Now you are to serve Me here'; but the service, I believe, really depended on the tabernacle.
Rem. It was on mount Sinai when God said that to him.
J.T. Mount Horeb is the name that is used.
Ques. Do you mean that there can be no service without the tabernacle?
J.T. No, I do not mean quite that, because there is the yielding of the body individually -- I have no doubt that a believer feels that his body is to be for
the Lord from the first moment of his conversion, but I doubt whether he has any idea of the tabernacle then; in fact, what you have is the influence of grace first; there is no demand upon the people at the outset; God would culture them under the influence of grace.
Rem. So the tabernacle is in view. Do you think we reach the tabernacle in Romans?
J.T. I think Romans is preparatory; you can only get the tabernacle in Romans by introducing it into chapter 12.
Ques. Romans really supplies the man, does it not?
J.T. And Corinthians takes him up.
Ques. Would chapter 12 just touch the edge of the collective thought -- the tabernacle?
J.T. I think it does. You have in chapter 12 the thought of our relationship with one another. Chapter 3 is of all moment to form one for the tabernacle position. What I see is that the introduction into the wilderness is brought to pass by that which is objective. We are led into the wilderness by the light presented -- the light of certain facts; it is not a question of what has taken place in you, although that is essential to your answering to these facts.
Ques. Do you refer to chapters 3, 4 and 5?
J.T. Yes. Whereas what enables you to get out of the wilderness is entirely subjective. I do not say there is not that which is objective -- the ark of the covenant is that, but we really get out of the wilderness by the Spirit.
Ques. How was that represented in the history of the children of Israel -- by that which followed the brazen serpent?
J.T. I think so. The tabernacle was not much in view at all after that -- it is rather the Spirit. "As many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God". You are not led by the tabernacle now but by the Spirit. Prior to that it was when the
cloud moved which was over the tabernacle, that they moved.
Ques. That is a question of light?
J.T. Entirely a question of light. Of course there has to be the work of God in us to enable us to respond -- I mean to say it is only a converted person that would recognise that light.
Ques. I suppose it is well to bear in mind that the wilderness is a very practical thought, is it not?
J.T. I think so, and it is not merely something that you have to pass through, it is designed of God. It is intended that the testimony should be there; hence the importance of the saint recognising that his body is requisite to it; you are needed there.
Ques. There are divine lessons there, that can be learned nowhere else?
J.T. And more than that, you have set forth the order that shall be established presently -- that order is to be seen in an adverse world: that is God's idea. What I understand by the wilderness is this: that God does not propose to alter your circumstances outwardly at all, what He proposes to do is to alter you, so that you should set forth His order there.
Rem. That is the difference between ourselves and Israel; they were led into a literal wilderness; now God affects us while we are still in the same circumstances; it is unseen to the natural eye.
J.T. The change is not in the circumstances but in you. I believe that any effort to alter your circumstances only interferes with the thought of God. He knows all about your circumstances before He touches you, and He intends to show the greatness of His work; He changes you and leaves the circumstances untouched. He supports you according to the light that has come into your soul.
Ques. Could you state what it is that entices you to take the wilderness position?
J.T. I think what you see in Moses is important.
He necessarily acquired a great place in the minds and hearts of the Israelites. He is really typical of Christ -- that he celebrated the passover for faith, that the destroying angel should not touch them -- it was not a question of himself but them. That shows his affection for them -- he considered for them; in that way I think he acquired a very great place in the minds and hearts of the children of Israel. Now if you apply that to the Lord I think you can understand how believers are led to accept baptism as the eunuch did -- the light of that Man in Isaiah 53 had come into his soul; He says, "here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?" Acts 8:36 Now it was said of the Israelites that they were all baptised unto Moses, but then what is said here is, "As many as have been baptised unto Christ Jesus, have been baptised unto his death". That is the point, I take it, here.
Ques. Death becomes the means of escape from all that is obnoxious?
J.T. Yes, now God takes you up. Hence how all the education comes in. It is one thing to be fitted for heaven -- I think the wilderness helps us there -- I think the wilderness qualifies us for heaven, but then you have to be qualified for your place in relation to the tabernacle and I believe the first year of grace -- the first year of the wilderness is for that purpose; you come under the influence of Christ, where there is no demand upon you, as it were, then God proposes a covenant.
Rem. It is very striking that in that first year even the murmurings did not bring judgment, it only brought out God's resources.
J.T. When you come to Numbers the word is spoken to Moses in the tabernacle in the wilderness, and the people are all to be numbered; there is to be a man of each tribe. I have no doubt there is the idea of local responsibility in that. You are numbered
in reference to your own locality. It was not done in an arbitrary way -- each tribe was represented. It all had in view the general arrangement in relation to the tabernacle of witness and that brings out, I think, the importance of the saint recognising God's claim on him. You recognise God's claim on you, that is to say, you are let down here, you are not taken to heaven, you are to be set in relation to the tabernacle of witness.
Ques. Do you mean that is what we are numbered for?
Ques. Were they not numbered in the order of their pitching, and in the order of their march both in relation to the tabernacle?
J.T. Yes, and each man was to pitch by the standard of his father's house.
Ques. Does the tabernacle represent what is coming, in a coming day?
J.T. Yes, it represents the order that is in the mind of God; the great thought is, that that should be set up, while things are adverse.
Ques. The order was to be represented in the camp of the people?
J.T. Yes, it was to be seen. Balaam saw it; he saw the people according to their tribes: "How goodly are thy tents, ... O Israel!" Numbers 24:5 He saw them according to their tribes; he looked on the wilderness, it was the people in the wilderness that Balaam saw.
Ques. What is equivalent to the tabernacle of witness now?
J.T. It is that in which divine thoughts are cherished. That is the idea of it. The tabernacle contained within it all the precious things of God -- pre-eminently the ark of the covenant -- that was the great central thought, so that it was carefully guarded.
H.W.S. What is the difference between the service
of God in the wilderness and the service in the land?
H.W.S. Is there not a service that the saints take up that is connected with their heavenly place?
J.T. What do you allude to? I only want to get your thoughts, you know.
H.W.S. I was thinking of the saints in the consciousness of sonship.
J.T. That is the continuation really -- there is only one service so far as I know, it begins in the wilderness.
Ques. Is that service always connected with the tabernacle?
J.S. Would the thought of the tabernacle bring in the idea of rule and law and all that which one must accept and bow to, and the pure grace of the first year prepares one to bow?
J.T. Yes, there can be no deviation from all that. You have to see that the affections were there at the outset. "I remember thee, the kindness of thy youth, the love of thine espousals, when thou wentest after me in the wilderness". Jeremiah 2:2 There was an indication of their affection, and the first is, I think, the nurturing: the seventy palm trees and twelve wells of water were to promote that.
Ques. Does Romans give you the first year?
J.T. I think so, but I think the epistle to the Romans contains more. I think it is important to see how God nurtures the affections of His people. The manna indicated that God would provide them with everything, but all to an end -- the proposal He makes to them in Exodus 19He would make a covenant with them and would dwell with them; wonderful thoughts! That was to be in the wilderness; all that shows the importance of the wilderness position. So that the book of Numbers begins with the second year, a man was supposed to be well on --
twenty years old and upwards; there they are, and they are numbered, and each man is to take up his local position in regard to the tabernacle.
J.B. I would like to ask what is the meaning of the four ensigns and why the standard -- bearers were Judah and Reuben, Ephraim and Dan?
J.T. Well, I do not know, except that it shows God's own sovereignty in the arrangement -- why Judah had the leading place would, I think, indicate the sovereignty of God -- it is not Joseph, it is Judah; God acts according to His sovereignty and then that must be according to perfect wisdom.
J.B. I was wondering whether we got a kind of view of the order and it ends really in apostasy.
J.T. But how important that we should each know his place in regard to that. A man pitches by the standard of his father's house, that refers to his local responsibility.
Rem. As to the company at Corinth being addressed.
J.T. It was "to the assembly of God which is in Corinth ... with all that in every place call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" 1 Corinthians 1:2; that is the general thought and the local thought, but the tabernacle is the great controlling, governing principle. The tabernacle was not a very ostentatious thing; compared with the temple it was very insignificant looking; the point in it is the value of the things contained within.
Ques. Is there anything that answers to the tabernacle now?
J.T. I think, as I said, it is that in which divine thoughts are cherished; to speak more correctly, it is that in which Christ has a place as the Centre of all divine thoughts.
Rem. That connects with Christ subjectively in the saints.
J.T. Wherever that is, that is the idea. You see it in the early part of the Acts.
Rem. Every type in the tabernacle finds an answer in connection with Christ and the assembly.
W.W. Is it individual exercise up to chapter 12 and is chapter 12 the first allusion to what is collective?
J.T. I think so. In chapter 12 you come to what is practical. There the apostle begins to apply the truth. "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the compassions of God, to present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God". Romans 12:1 God can use your body in the wilderness -- you present your bodies living -- the testimony is to be maintained by life, in living persons, and living persons from the divine point of view are persons who love, they love Christ and they love one another, that is to say Christ is cherished as the Centre of divine thoughts.
J.S. Would you say that the man in accord with Christ is found in Romans -- the wood, and that in chapter 12 we have the gold appearing -- the testimony of God is reached?
J.T. Yes, I think so. One has to think of himself wisely, soberly, according to his measure.
Rem. So that there is to be divine order in the wilderness -- in reference to our individual pathway there.
J.T. There is that here in which Christ is cherished as the ark of the covenant; in other words, as the One in whom all divine thoughts centre, and you want to be in relation to that, and you stand up in your own locality in relation to that. Others do the same, so that the same principles govern these people -- they have one thought before them.
Rem. That is the importance of chapter 12 -- the
will of God. Romans leads up, does it not, to the assembly, though as to actual fact you do not get the assembly?
J.T. It lays a basis in the soul for it, so that strictly the epistle to Romans, rightly understood, prepares the saints for Ephesians.
Rem. I think it is specially helpful to notice that Romans supplies the man.
J.T. Yes, I was looking at chapter 12 to see how the believer comes up to the point. Paul says, "I say, through the grace which has been given to me, to every one that is among you, not to have high thoughts above what he should think; but to think so as to be wise, as God has dealt to each a measure of faith. For, as in one body we have many members, but all the members have not the same office; thus we, being many, are one body in Christ, and each one members one of the other. But having different gifts, according to the grace which has been given to us, whether it be prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith", etc. Romans 12:3 - 6. You see how the thing is regulated. I think the design of God is that whilst there is a catholic system -- the universal principle -- the same principle governs the universe, you have also the local thought, that is, that the same order prevails in all the assemblies.
Rem. That you connect with Israel dwelling in their tents.
J.T. Yes, there is the order. Balaam's prophecy shows the importance of the book of Numbers, from God's point of view -- the importance of the saints being in order.
J.B. Then do you speak of the wilderness as the usual circumstances of the saints?
J.T. Yes. The circumstances in which God has reached you, these circumstances become a wilderness to you; they are not altered, you are left in them, but now enlightened and educated and supported in
them so that in you, as in others, God is able to set forth His mind and thought in the presence of evil. Evil is still untouched publicly.
J.B. Then is it your thought that as the children of Israel took their places in connection with the tabernacle, so we take up usual circumstances down here in the light of what has been set forth in Christ?
J.T. Yes, I think so. Moses brought all the light down from the mountain and that was given expression to in that which was constructed. Now we are to be in the light of it and we are to see to it that we answer to it.
Ques. What is the difference between that thought and that in Ephesians 2:22, "Built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit"?
J.T. No difference in this sense that the habitation is there, but then Ephesians is not the setting forth of divine order in the wilderness. What do you say, Mr. M.?
Ques. When you were speaking of the tabernacle and the temple, did you confine your thought of the tabernacle to the coming age or do you link it with eternity?
J.T. I see what you mean. It is in the coming world you see the order. God created a universe -- moral order is there set forth, but then you have in the eternal order of things the idea of the tabernacle as a dwelling, not as a sphere of order, but as a dwelling, "The tabernacle of God is with men". Revelation 21:3
Rem. You think that the temple is connected with the thought of kingdom glory; when you come to the tabernacle you have the very nature of God -- not so much the contrast?
J.T. Yes, the tabernacle is really the greater thought and therefore the importance of seeing that it was in the wilderness.
Ques. Would you connect the last verse with the thought of the tabernacle as the dwelling?
Ques. Is that not the end God has reached in the assembly?
Ques. So that Ephesians links the coming age with eternity?
J.T. It does. Now in regard of chapter 8, the point is not the order of the wilderness and guidance by objective facts, but the Spirit guides. "As many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God". What I mean by objective is, for instance, baptism, it signifies that there has been movement; the Lord Jesus has left one order of things. He has left it by death, that is light, and we are affected by that light and so we accept baptism. Now Numbers 21 comes in; it is the termination of that order of things and the Spirit known as the subjective power becomes the means of guidance, so that sonship comes to light and not merely the light of it, but the effect of it in us.
Ques. How are you using the word 'guidance' there?
J.T. The Spirit, I believe, guides the believer through his intelligence, through his affections, he comes to apprehend unseen things.
F.W.J. Does the light come from Moses and the power of life through the Spirit?
J.T. I think so, Mr. J. All that is objective comes through Moses -- Moses is the apostle, but the subjective is clearly in the Spirit.
F.W.J. The flesh is supposed to have gone?
J.T. Yes, quite so. What one looks for in the assembly is guidance by the Spirit. When we come together we are guided by certain objective facts; it is a fact that brings us together. But then the great thing is to be governed by the light that has been
given by God to govern any given position and I believe that after the brazen serpent a new chapter begins and the sons of God are brought to light by the Spirit -- by the full unqualified recognition of the Spirit.
Ques. Then in a way the saints are looked at abstractly, are they not?
J.T. What do you mean by that?
Rem. Well, as to actual fact they are still alive in the life of flesh, but what has been brought to pass in the triumph of God is that God has a people living in the Spirit, and that, as a result, the body is presented a living sacrifice, but what underlies all that is the fact that they have been made to live in the Spirit.
J.T. Quite so. That underlies all our relations here on earth. Now, when you come to the history of the believer after the brazen serpent, you come to what is divine territory. The territory prior to that is not divine, there was not dislodgment of enemies there; when you come to the brazen serpent there is dislodgment of enemies. It is not Canaan, but it is territory that is divine. It was divinely given territory and had to be possessed; it was not the territory in which they were to live -- a man's business and his family -- that is divine territory.
Rem. One's business must not be governed by the principles of the world.
J.T. It is an entire mistake to assume that a man's business can be governed by the principles of the world.
Ques. Do you call a man's business divine territory?
J.T. The whole point in it is that he may have something to sacrifice; that is the reason why Moses would not leave the cattle.
Ques. Are we still in the wilderness?
J.T. There is a certain divine territory that you
have to pass, you recognise it; well, that divine territory was not over Jordan; it means a man's family and a man's business, as I understand it; it means legitimate relations here -- what I mean by that is every relation that God can own, but then you are not to live in that; the mischief is that many live in their families or they live in their business.
Ques. Did you say that it is given us for sacrifice; will you tell us what you mean by that?
J.T. Well, you have got something to give away.
Rem. I suppose if you take a man of the world he is characterised by covetousness; God has made us to live in the Spirit and in that way we are saved from that principle.
J.T. The sorrowful part about the two -- and -- a -- half tribes was that they thought Moab was a good place for their cattle. They thought of their business and they would stay there. It was all very well to leave the cattle there, it was the place, but why live with the cattle?
Rem. I suppose if they had left the choice with God they would have had a portion both sides as they will in the future.
J.T. Quite so. All very well to go back to Moab to the cattle provided your living associations are in Canaan; if you live in your family, when you come to the assembly you are away from home; the meeting becomes a sort of duty. The two -- and -- a -- half tribes went over to fight but it was simply a matter of duty; then they went back to Moab. There were only nine -- and -- a -- half tribes in Canaan and the two-and -- a -- half tribes had to have an altar to prove their right to go up to the tabernacle to worship, because they lived in Moab. Where there is that sort of thing there are great pains taken to prove your right to be there. If we were always there we should not have to maintain our rights there.
Ques. So if you go back to the other side it is not presenting your body a living sacrifice?
J.T. No. I think presenting your body a living sacrifice means you are wholly at the disposal of God.
Ques. Do you think that if we know what it is to go over Jordan we shall take up everything in connection with the plains of Moab and there will be a heavenly colour connected with it?
J.T. It is all well to go out of Canaan to see your cattle but be sure you live in Canaan.
Ques. What do you understand by living in Canaan?
J.T. Well, there you come to relationships, the Father and the Son and the sons, you come to divinely formed relationships, there you are at home.
J.S. You mean "As many as are led" leads on to that.
J.T. I think so. That is the leading of the Spirit.
Rem. As to yielding your body a living sacrifice.
J.T. I think you yield your body unqualifiedly: "When thou vowest a vow unto God, defer not to pay it; for he hath no pleasure in fools". Ecclesiastes 5:4 If you assume that you present your body to the Lord, see that you pay the vow -- that there is no reserve -- you yield yourself to God.
Ques. What is the difference between the circumstances you speak of in the wilderness and the circumstances you speak of as divine territory?
J.T. Well, coming in contact with the world as it is -- it is adverse to you; but then your family things are not adverse, yet that is not the land of Canaan.
Ques. So that the wilderness you speak of would be the adverse conditions?
J.T. Yes, the adverse conditions over which God does not assume to have any control, in a sense; but He supports you in them; so that His order and His character can be seen in it. When you come to your house, God's support is there; God's influence is
there; you baptise your children, for instance, it is controlled by God in that sense, and the same principles hold good in your business, so far as I see. To assume that the principles of the world can obtain in your business and not in your house is all a mistake; the garment spotted by the flesh is to be hated.
Rem. I suppose the circumstances can only be the wilderness in the measure in which they are taken up in the light of baptism.
J.T. Yes, the tabernacle supposes that. The coverings of the tabernacle suppose reproach, whereas the temple did not. The temple was glory, there was no evil occurrent.
Ques. When you come to the land, is testimony connected with that?
J.T. I think the wilderness is the sphere of testimony.
Ques. Would you take the thought of the one body as the wilderness?
Ques. What is the character of the conflict on the wilderness side of Jordan?
J.T. I think it is the flesh and the power of flesh in oneself.
Ques. Do you not think the wiles of Balaam specially came in there?
J.T. Yes. I was going to say you have the accuser -- the influence in heavenly places against you, then the teaching of Balaam who cast a stumbling block -- the Moabitish influence -- family relationships: relationships of this sort kept up in preference to assembly links -- these things we have to encounter, and they have to be overcome. If Balaam could not curse them, he would seduce them.
Ques. What is the difference between the relationships in which we stand in the wilderness and those of the land?
J.T. In Corinthians our bodies are said to be the members of Christ; we are said to be, although many, one body in Christ; that is to say, I think it works out in the way in which we regard each other -- we hold each other in affection.
Ques. Do you think the thought of formation comes in there?
J.T. Well, it is essential, you could not have the idea of the body without love.
Rem. I mean if you take Romans, you have the spirit of sonship, but when you come to Ephesians you have formation that has taken place in connection with the presence of the Spirit.
J.T. Quite so. All that leads up to heavenly ground -- our bodies are the members of Christ -- there is a testimony in that way as to unity seen in our bodies -- we being many, and the Corinthians are said to be locally the body of Christ -- the character is there.
Ques. What is the difference between the way sonship is presented in Romans and in Ephesians?
J.T. In Romans it is the Spirit rather, as has been said.
W.B. Is that in contrast to the thing itself?
J.T. I would not say it is in contrast to the thing, but it is not the fulness of it. That is, that God has predestinated us to sonship -- the thing itself.
W.G. Is it by the Spirit you can understand heavenly privilege?
J.T. I think that is Romans. What a wonderful thing it is to see sonship -- that is people led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.
Ques. No public evidence, but a moral one?
J.T. I do not think sonship is for a testimony here; the point is what you are.
Ques. You connect the idea of the body of Christ with testimony here?
J.T. Corinthians is that. Corinthians contemplates the body here; Ephesians is the body in connection with God's counsels -- the complement of Christ.
Ques. Do you get assembly ground in Romans?
J.T. The assembly convened is not in Romans. As has been said, Romans brings in the man. The man that God can take up.
Rem. You must have the man to go to church.
J.T. Exactly; so that a good Roman makes a good Ephesian.
Genesis 27:24 - 40; Numbers 6:22 - 27
What I have on my mind is to speak a word about the blessing of God. I thought rather to show the manner of its communication than to enlarge upon the thing itself -- it would be undertaking a rather big task to speak upon the blessing itself.
In response to Esau's question, "Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me?" it comes to light that Isaac had more than one blessing, and, coupling this with the allusion to this incident in the New Testament, we are confirmed in that thought. We are told "By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come". Hebrews 11:20 So that you can see that in speaking of blessing we touch a very wide subject. Undoubtedly every family shall have its own distinct blessing. It is intimated here. The Lord Jesus will have to say to each family and will bless each. So the subject becomes very extensive, and I do not attempt to speak of the thing itself but of the manner of it.
You will remember what is said in regard of ourselves: we are blessed "with every spiritual blessing" Ephesians 1:3 -- others may have one or two, but we have all, and, more than that, we have them in heaven -- that is the place we have them in -- "In the heavenlies in Christ". I refer to that as a theme that should prepossess every christian heart. Other thoughts have their place, but that thought should prepossess our hearts. I commend it to you, and may the Lord lead us to ponder the greatness of the portion that is ours when the full mind of God is disclosed. That is what gives character and preciousness to Paul's line -- the whole counsel of God. Finding an appreciative company, he is enabled to bring it to
light, and when the whole counsel of God is brought to light we find we have the first place in connection with Christ. He begins with the assembly. The assembly has the first place there; it is formed and placed in the heavenlies in connection with Christ before the blessing of the other families. We have part in all the others while having distinct blessing of our own. We are blessed with every spiritual blessing by the Father Himself, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ: "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenlies in Christ". Ephesians 1:3 In such fashion was the apostle, in apprehension of soul in the presence of the Father, moved by the greatness of the divine thought in regard to the assembly. He would lay it on the hearts of the Ephesian saints, that they might be in the light of it. What marvellous light it is! -- the bringing in of what the heart of God cherished in a past eternity -- that we should have that place. We would not have it in any other than Christ Jesus. As loving the Lord Jesus the youngest believer would instinctively refuse to have it in another; but the magnitude of the position is emphasised.
As I was saying, I desire to present the manner of it, and I take Isaac to be typical of Christ as the Blesser; that is to say, from the birth of Isaac, especially from his weaning until he blesses Jacob and Esau, we have the christian dispensation in type. From the moment of Isaac's weaning we have in the forefront a man whose origin and destiny is heaven -- at every turn you find heaven signalises the presence of that man here. After he is weaned Ishmael mocks. There was nothing in the babe to draw out hatred, to provoke malice, the malice must have arisen from another cause -- it was not the babe personally. Hence the unjustifiable attitude of Ishmael. Ishmael must go, but he is cast out as blessed. The angel called out of heaven to Hagar -
there is the allusion to Isaac -- out of respect to Isaac, Ishmael is blessed. If you examine the previous allusion to Ishmael when Hagar fled from Sarah, the angel of the Lord spoke to Hagar but not out of heaven; but now that Isaac is on the scene, even Ishmael is taken account of in heaven. Such is Isaac! At the offering up of Isaac the angel of the Lord calls twice out of heaven, emphasising the fact that he is a heavenly man -- the man whom Abraham offered up was an object of interest in heaven. I allude to this so that we may get clearly before us the position of Isaac as the heavenly man. Ishmael comes into blessing and Esau comes into blessing. It is very simple and it throws light on the dispensation to which we belong -- a dispensation in which everybody is blessed. I do not say everybody enjoys the blessing; but it is there for everybody, without preference even a mocker, a persecutor, is blessed. The man, too, who despised his birthright, the profane person -- the Spirit tells us, "By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau". Hebrews 11:20 That gives us some idea of our dispensation -- I think we should boast in it -- a dispensation in which blessing goes out unhinderedly.
I want to dwell upon Isaac -- I have often said he is Paul's great text in the Old Testament. The section of Scripture that records the birth and life and the doings of Isaac presents the ministry of the apostle Paul. It is the man who, first of all, obtains the place of pre-eminence in Abraham's house. Abraham makes a feast when Isaac is weaned -- doubtless an allusion to the separation of the Lord Jesus from Israel. Isaac obtains the pre-eminent place in the house; hence the mocking of Ishmael. Then, on the other hand, he becomes the victim, and as the victim offered up, heaven claims him -- he is the supreme object of heaven. Twice in chapter 22 the angel called out of heaven. Then we get the relationship with the assembly -- Isaac receives Rebekah. His
mother dies and he is alone in the field -- he is said to be praying. Did you ever see Him thus? His mother's tent is empty and Isaac is alone in the field. Now you will never understand your place in His heart until you see Him thus. The Lord needs us! Chapters 23 and 24 taken together, show the Lord recognising the place Israel has in the mind of God and the fact that it will cease. It is one thing that Isaac was weaned, it is another thing to see Israel deceased. The Lord felt it, and Paul felt it!
In the end of chapter 24, Isaac is seen alone in the field -- what is he meditating about? It refers to prayer -- there is a want in his heart. There is a place in the heart of Christ for every saint. One would love to fill a place in the heart of Christ! The love of Christ is towards the assembly -- He loved the assembly and gave Himself for it. What a thought to have a place like that in the heart of Christ!
Isaac is alone -- at this point Paul comes in; the mission of Abraham's servant is typical of Paul's ministry. Paul got near enough to the heart of Christ to discern what He wanted. Paul went out into the world to get the assembly -- the assembly was there before; the coming of the Spirit had formed it; the treasure was in the field. The field is not Israel; it is the world -- it is where Isaac was meditating. Paul went out and brought it in. What a ministry! Those with David heard when he longed for water from the well at Bethlehem. This indicates somewhat how Paul felt the longings of the heart of the Lord Jesus. John heard the voice of the Bridegroom but Paul heard the beatings of His heart. "I have espoused you to one husband" 2 Corinthians 11:2 gives the idea. He would have their affections undivided -- any division of our affections is the work of the enemy -- he says, "I am jealous as to you with a jealousy which is of God". 2 Corinthians 11:2 He feared that as the serpent beguiled Eve, so their thoughts should be corrupted from simplicity
as to the Christ. How does he beguile us? By the introduction of something that divides the heart with Christ. A divided heart is the work of the devil -- a double minded man is unstable in all his ways. Let it be what it may that divides the heart with Christ, it is the fruit of the devil's work. Paul presented one Man. He says, "Henceforth know we no man after the flesh; yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more". 2 Corinthians 5:16 Where did Paul meet the Lord Jesus as a heavenly Man? The first time he saw Him, the first time he heard Him, it was out of heaven, and he presented in the gospel what he saw and heard. What was his ministry? It was the ministry of Christ. He came to Corinth and presented one Man in the gospel. The effect was, souls were converted. He loved Christ and he attached them to Christ. In that way Paul espoused them to Christ. Think of that word 'espoused'. He says, "I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ". 2 Corinthians 11:2 He presented Christ, and they were brought to love the Lord. That is how the assembly is formed -- you are brought into the assembly in that way. You discover your place in His heart, and He has got a place in yours. That place is to be reserved for Him! The Lord detests a divided heart -- it results in idolatry; the Lord is displaced.
Now that is really chapter 24 -- Rebekah is brought to Isaac and he is comforted after his mother's death. When we come to chapter 27 we have the blesser. It is all the history of Isaac, and it shows the extent of the blessing -- even he who deserved the curse is blessed. We see how indiscriminate the blessing is: "By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau". Hebrews 11:20 That is our dispensation! Blessing is universal in the hands of the heavenly Man. The heavenly Man is marked by suffering rather than vindictiveness. Look at the
Lord Jesus -- He says to Saul, "Why persecutest thou me?" Acts 9:4 How easily He could have disposed of Saul in judgment! What had he been doing? He had gone into the houses of the members of Christ and dragged both men and women off to prison. As James says, "Ye have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you". James 5:6 That is the heavenly Man! That is Christ! It shall not be so in the future. The Psalms call for vengeance. We could not use the Psalms as the experience of our exercises. Take Stephen -- he was condemned and killed, and there was no resistance. The Lord says to Saul, "Why dost thou persecute me?" There was nothing there to call out Saul's hatred. "It is hard for thee to kick against the pricks" Acts 26:14 -- that is the heavenly Man. Is it not a simple thing to see what the heavenly Man is? There, too, you have what the assembly is -- the Lord discloses in that one verse what the assembly is. That is what the saints were at the beginning and the Lord acknowledges that such people are Himself The Lord does not own the man who defends himself -- he belongs to another dispensation. The heavenly man does not resist; he becomes a martyr; Stephen's face shines as the face of an angel. That indicates something of what Christ was as expressed here. Saul got in the Lord's first address to him what He is Himself and what the assembly is.
Now that is how Saul met the Lord Jesus and his heart was imbued with a sense of blessing. We know how he spoke of it afterwards, that instead of dealing with him in judgment, the Lord converted him, brought him to Himself and gave him the Holy Spirit. There we come to what we have in Genesis 27; "Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau". The Lord blessed Saul of Tarsus; so you can see in the first meeting of the Lord with Saul how the idea of His position as the Blesser comes out -- instead of being dealt with in judgment, Saul is blessed.
I wish to show you that Isaac, in chapter 27, is conscious of the blessing. The nearer you get to the Lord, the more He impresses you with His ability to bless. Isaac would bless Esau -- the thought in his mind is to bless. He says of Jacob, "Yea, and he shall be blessed". But Isaac had more than one blessing; he blesses Jacob and Esau; that is to say, if the heavenly Man blesses, the blessing is universal, it is available for all.
I would add one more thought. In speaking of the manner of the blessing, it afterwards comes out through the priest -- the priest was a heavenly man; he was clad in the robe of blue. But here you come to a man under obligation, as an official. Isaac was not an official; he is conscious of the blessing, and he blesses accordingly, "Yea, and he shall be blessed" -- there is no possibility of reversal. "See, the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which Jehovah hath blessed". What a wonderful thing to have an odour like that! When you come to the priest, he is directed how to bless; he has access to God; he goes inside. The habit of going inside is very important; turning to God is our greatest privilege -- we are entitled at any time to take up the priestly function. The sanctuary is all lit up by Christ. Suppose you go to heaven actually -- you see One there who has a Man's feelings, a Man's sympathies. The One who has got you and me on His heart is the Light of heaven -- He illuminates heaven. We are encouraged to draw near, having such a High Priest. The way is open -- "Let us draw near!" Hebrews 10:22 That High Priest is on our side -- that Man knows all about you; He has your name on His breastplate. How lovely! Does it not give us confidence? As we draw near we are supported by the Lord Jesus. I allude to that in connection with the Priest -- our names are on His heart, and He has direct access to God.
In Leviticus 8, the priests abide at the door of the
tabernacle for seven days, and in chapter 9, Aaron and Moses go in to the tabernacle, and when they come out they bless the congregation. The blessing was then on the earth; now Christ blesses out of heaven. In Luke 24, the Man who blesses the people is carried up into heaven -- heaven is influenced by that Man. What a thought! The Man who has gone in and who illuminates heaven has been carried up. It is not that He went up, that He ascended -- the point in Luke is, the Man who blesses is carried up.
In the ritual in Numbers, the priest blesses according to all the intelligence of the mind of God. The blessing comes to us through such a Man -- through the Man who has got access, and who blesses according to all His infinite intelligence and holiness. So that blessing for all comes out through the heavenly Man, and comes to us through the Priest. The One who lifted up His hands and blessed them is carried up into heaven -- heaven will have a Man like that.
May the Lord enable us to follow these thoughts, so that we may realise the importance of the manner of the blessing of God -- how it comes out universally, and to ourselves.
Luke 6:12 - 19; Luke 10:20 - 22
Luke writes, as he tells us, with method, and I suppose that method is not simply chronological. I take it his method is moral, he arranges his subjects methodically, in order to present the truth in such a way that it should be expressive of God and of His grace, and also that it might be intelligible and acceptable to man. With this end in view, he removes every possible hindrance, so that the prejudices of men should not be aroused; that men should be in no way at a disadvantage when the truth is presented to them. So he introduces his narrative here with a peculiar incident, in which the Lord Jesus is seen descending from the mount with His disciples to a level place. But before descending He is presented to us as spending a whole night in prayer to God. This is not as John presents things. John records that "God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son", John 3:16 but Luke works this out as seen and developed in the ministry and walk of Christ, so that one is impressed with the sense of what Elihu said, "My terror shall not make thee afraid", Job 33:7. Luke takes pains in this way to present the Lord as allaying every prejudice in the heart of man, hence in his gospel -- in his methodical presentation of the truth -- he unfolds the grace of God as brought out in Christ, not indeed in the terse and concise way that John does, but according to the moral order which is characteristic of his writings. John says, "grace and truth came by Jesus Christ", John 1:17 but Luke breaks that up for us in a methodical way. So he begins by saying, "he went out into the mountain to pray, and he spent the night in prayer to God". What the Lord said to His Father in all that night is not
recorded. It will doubtless be included in those books that John speaks of, that would fill the world if they were written, but they have not been written: John 17 does not give us this prayer. It was not uttered in the hearing of the disciples. "He went out into the mountain to pray", it says, "and he spent the night in prayer to God"; that is, a Man mediatorially with God. Then it goes on, "when it was day", that is, the time of working -- when it arrived, He says, 'Now I am going to associate men with Me -- men known to others -- some fishermen -- some tax-gatherers, and so forth: I am going to associate these with Myself in approaching humanity'. So it says, "when it was day he called his disciples"; and then He made a selection. It is a mediatorial scene, that is, the activity of Christ in carrying the gospel in the most effective way from God, to man in the plain, is seen. It is Christ, and Christ mediatorially. "There is ... one mediator" the word tells us, "between God and men, the man Christ Jesus". 1 Timothy 2:5 So the Lord calls His disciples apart in order to make His momentous choice, not thinking of their dignity, but of the men on the plain -- the lepers, the demon-possessed, the paralytics, all the sin-stricken and sin-sorrowing of the plain -- these were in His mind. The whole race of mankind was before Him -- none less -- for He was the Son of man, and all that fell to man was His; not only the assets, but the liabilities. We must not forget there were assets, for God has indicated these, and they stood awaiting Christ's coming: dominion over creation, the throne of David, and priesthood -- all these came under Christ. But then the liabilities -- terrible and far-reaching in their nature -- were His also. Let us think of that -- that I was a liability; I was no asset; and the Lord had to take account of my affairs, and to meet them in death; nevertheless, when it came to Him, He shirked nothing.
So He called His disciples, and chose twelve who should be His associates in the mission that He was about to undertake. It is well to have before our souls the care and forethought with which the Lord Jesus in becoming Man took up His work. He nominates twelve men, whom, it says, also He named apostles. It was an official act, and all the official acts of Christ were with good in view. He had before Him the welfare of others. It was no question of ennobling those twelve men; the point was to do the work; the nobility and honour would await them (that we shall speak of later); the point in the Lord's mind was that they should get on to the plain as fast as possible and with the best equipment. The need was on the plain: every sinner was there: the 'no-difference' doctrine of Paul belongs to the plain. Judaism was national -- a sort of mountain towering above all others, whereas Paul brought in the 'no-difference' doctrine, which answers to the scripture we have here: "having descended with them, he stood on a level place"; and he brought it in in a peculiar way, not only announcing 'no difference', but acting on the 'no-difference' principle. He could say to Peter at Antioch: You are not acting it. Peter had drawn back, turning the saints aside from the principle of the plain. Paul held to it and says, "I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed". Galatians 2:11 Is there anyone holding preferential position in the things of God? There can be no such position from the divine side manward. So Paul says, "Unto the Jews, I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews". 1 Corinthians 9:20 I got on their level, he says -- that is the idea of the plain: I became "all things to all men, that I might by all means save some". 1 Corinthians 9:22 He was entirely in accord with the mission of Christ; he had no thought of his own dignity. Let no one think that a preacher is above his congregation; he must come down to their level,
and below them, if he is to help them. Paul became all things. Whatever men made him -- whatever indignity was laid upon him -- he was ready to accept it in order to reach precious souls.
Now we find the Lord formally accrediting the apostles as His representatives, and in this connection it is interesting to note that it does not say He sent them (this He did afterwards), but "he came down with them". It is what one has just been asking the Lord to do -- to come with us. The remarkable thing here is that it does not say that they came with Him, but He with them, that is, they are to do the work now. It is very wonderful that God should take up men to set forth the gospel, for angels are mightier than men, but He is pleased to take up men -- men who are restored in their right hand. We find, in the incident that precedes this, the Lord going into the synagogue and healing the man whose hand was withered. The right hand must be healed. "The heart of a wise man is at his right hand", Ecclesiastes 10:2 that is, in other words, the servant of Christ is actuated by love. So his right hand must be stretched out and healed; he is to be actuated by his heart, not by his head -- actuated by love for souls.
And now the Lord descends with His disciples to a level place. Where are you tonight? Are you prepared to take a humble place with the race of humanity, acknowledging that you are no different from all others? See the kind of people who were on the plain! -- "a great multitude of the people, ... and those that were beset by unclean spirits". Note it says that first they "came to hear". Are you prepared to hear what Christ has to say to you tonight? This meeting is in order that you may be spoken to in grace, and the Lord would raise the question with you as to whether you came to hear. Now that is an important point. It first says, they came to hear Him; and secondly, to be healed of their diseases. That is the
moral order. They were not only affected in regard to their diseases, they wanted to hear. We read of one who says, "I will hear what God the Lord will speak; for he will speak peace unto his people". Psalm 85:8 What would the Lord say to you? He would speak to you according to the state of your soul, but He is not limited to that. In speaking to Mary He was not addressing her according to the state of her soul; we are simply told that He was speaking and she was hearing. She was an advanced hearer, we might say. It is of moment, not only to hear what the Lord would say to you personally, but to give ear to whatever He says. Poor Zedekiah said, "Is there any word from the Lord?" Jeremiah 37:17 He was not prepared for the word that came, for that word was terrible. Jerusalem was to be destroyed and sacked, and the kingdom taken away from the poor king: it was a dreadful word, nevertheless, it was "a word from the Lord". But whilst the Lord speaks to you, as I was saying, according to your need, He speaks other things, and we want to hear whatever He says. Everything He says is of value, so Mary was listening, we are told, to what He was saying. He is the Word of God, and He is not limited to the need of my soul; He speaks of God. So in the narrative in this chapter we find they "came to hear". The Lord has got a word for you. He would remind you of your need of Him. After all, you will not gain much in your endeavour to find satisfaction in the world if that is what you are after. I have seen a good bit of it, though not like Solomon; I have seen it in passing, but Solomon saw it and tasted it by the help of God. No one can say that today. Any man who goes in for the world today has to do so at his own expense, but it was not so with Solomon; he had ability, intelligence and means, so he drank of all the rivers. "All the rivers", he tells us, "run into the sea; yet the sea is not full". Ecclesiastes 1:7 It was his own poor heart he had in view. It
was a big heart, as he was a great man, and the rivers all turned into it, and yet he was unsatisfied. So we may say with the little bit you have got, and the little bit I have got -- there is no satisfaction. You may obtain it according to your price, to the extent of sixpence or a shilling, a pound, or one hundred pounds, whatever your means may be. If you have the means of a Rockefeller you could buy it to any extent, and yet, like that poor man, you might not, perhaps, be able to digest a single meal. However much your means, you cannot be satisfied with what you buy, for the elements of satisfaction are not there. I am stating things that all may know, but they are timely things to say. War is over, and Satan is busy seeking to rearrange and readjust things to satisfy his votaries of whom, alas! the greater number of the world consists; he is active, I say, and rearranging his affairs so that he might lull to sleep the exercises which have arisen in the hearts of men. God would stir up, by means of all that men have passed through, a sense of responsibility towards Himself; a sense, too, of all that obtains in the world -- its wickedness and woe, and Satan is working to allay all that by the racecourse and places of amusement. But the elements of satisfaction are wanting: "Her guests are in the depths of hell", Proverbs 9:18 we are told. Terrible language! -- the world in that character setting itself under Satan's direction to decoy and destroy the souls of men. Well, wisdom, in face of all this, lifts up her voice. "Wisdom is justified of all her children" Luke 7:35; and her children appear in this gospel. So now we find the Lord Jesus, having come down, associates with Himself twelve men to relieve those on the plain. That is what He is doing tonight, coming down to your level, endeavouring to impress you with the sense that He is near you, so that virtue, which is available for you from Himself, might be imparted to you. So first the people hear; then they want to
be healed; and then it says, "all the crowd sought to touch him". There is a general movement in the multitude towards the Lord. Are you prepared to make a move in that direction? As having come down to your level, He has placed Himself where He can be touched, becoming one of us, as it were, in His grace, for it says, "power went out from him, and healed all". How beautiful is His grace! I would appeal to you if you have any need in your soul to come and touch Him. Lay hold of Christ on the principle of faith, for, after all, the word is not far from you; you have not to go to heaven, or to the depths, "the word is near thee", the apostle says, "in thy mouth and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach". Romans 10:8 How terrible is the responsibility of a child of christian parents, brought up in a christian home, and taught to read the word and to pray. The word is near you; it is all about you. Are you to put it away? And what is that word? It is "the word of faith, which we preach: that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth Jesus as Lord, and shalt believe in thine heart that God has raised him from among the dead, thou shalt be saved". Romans 10:9 How beautiful! How simple! Mark you, I am not now referring to what I am saying; I am speaking of what you have in your heart and mouth, that is, "the word of faith, which we preach". And then it goes on to say, "If thou shalt confess ... thou shalt be saved", Romans 10:9. May I appeal to anyone who has not come to a decision to lay hold of the word in this way. I can remember when I did. It came about in the most simple and unexpected and unpremeditated way, but I never faltered after that. You believe, and confess that Jesus is Lord. You lift up a standard in the presence of the enemy; you own Christ publicly as your Lord, and you believe in your heart privately with God.
I could not put the gospel in a simpler way to you.
I do not pretend to be a 'plain' man, but I would endeavour to be one tonight. I would present the gospel as I see it. Christ has come down with His apostles to the plain, to heal men, and it remains for you now to confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and to believe in thy heart that God has raised Him from the dead. "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation" (Romans 10:10). If anyone were to ask me why I have got a mouth, I should reply, 'To confess Christ with', and the first use I am to make of my heart is to believe on Him. He is presented thus to me that my heart should believe on this blessed Man raised from the dead.
And now one word as to the other side. While Christ accords power to those who present the gospel on the plain, their honour and dignity is not there. The occasion of rejoicing of the people of God is that their names are written in heaven. The seventy come back and say, "even the demons are subject to us through thy name". Luke 10:17 What a testimony! They came back victorious and occupied with their victory. Like many of us, we are all disposed to live in what marks us in testimony and in service, but the Lord does not give us power for service in order that we should live in that. That is a peculiar kind of power intended for service, but not to live on. The occasion of our joy is elsewhere. The life, privilege, honour and dignity of Christ all lie elsewhere; they lie outside of man. So the Lord says, "I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven". Luke 10:18 That is a greater victory. 'You are talking of what has happened on earth', He would say, 'but I saw Satan fall from heaven'. How beautiful! Think of your name written in heaven: think of my name written there! In travelling about the world one has to write one's name a good many times -- one's name, age, mother's name, and whereabouts -- all that
information has to be furnished. But what I would say is, you will not have to give this in heaven, your name is already recorded there eternally, your name is actually written there. When the matter of books comes up, we find that the book of life is brought in as a further testimony in regard to the lost. The books are opened, it says, and the dead are judged according to their works. The works are recorded, according to those books. The word is 'books', suggestive of a number -- a reflection which fills the heart with sorrow as one thinks of the vast numbers of this poor race classified with the 'dead' -- "I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God". Revelation 20:12 Terrible thought! But then it says, another book (not books) was opened, for all the names of the redeemed are in one book; the thought of unity is there, all the names of the redeemed are written. Now, it is noticeable that it does not come into view at the translation, it is not searched in order to find whether my name is there before I go up, it comes into view a thousand years later in connection with the lost. The other books are opened first, and there is abundance to condemn, but it is as if God said, 'Lest there should be any mistake, I shall look in the book of life, and see if your name is inscribed there'. In order that every conscience may be satisfied that there is no possible hope for the lost, no kind of exemption for them, God opens this book. Are you prepared to have your name entered in the book of life? It is a serious matter, for records are being constantly kept, and your responsibility is put down against you. The book of life is a special book in which the names of the saints are inscribed in legible characters. They are perfectly readable and cannot be erased. It says in Revelation, in the address to Sardis, "I will not blot his name out of the book of life". Revelation 3:5 It does not say any are blotted out, the statement is made in order to assure the redeemed that
their names are not blotted out. If Christ does not blot them out, who can?
But here what we find is that our names are registered in heaven. Think of that, that my name is written in heaven. How it should sink into every christian's heart! You rejoice in that. I have often raised the question with myself, as to whether I ever did rejoice in it. There is a book which is called 'Who's Who' in which is entered the name of every person of importance in the United Kingdom, their ancestry, rank, etc. When I go up to heaven, how many of those men shall I see there? There is a book in heaven after the pattern of 'Who's Who', and the name of every heavenly christian is there. So the Lord says, "Rejoice, because your names are written in heaven", and then He rejoices -- the Lord rejoices -- in spirit. In following the gospel narrative how one's heart is drawn out to the Lord in all the woes of His path; so when one comes to a point like this -- one of the bright spots in His sojourn here -- how one rejoices. When He touches the thought of heaven, immediately He thinks of the Father, of His counsels, of His abode, of all that He has before Him, and He rejoices in spirit, for nothing of all the Father's counsels shall fail, everything will come to pass, so we shall each have our place in heaven according to the Father's appointment.
What a prospect for us as drawing nigh to the end! One can be conscious of a spirit of expectation arising in the hearts of the people of God. As the world goes down in utter confusion, so the hopes of the saints grow brighter. So the Lord rejoices in spirit; may not we rejoice with Him, for not only are our names written in heaven, but the effectuation of the counsels of God is nigh. May God bless His word!
Ezekiel 8:1 - 4; Ezekiel 9:1 - 11
Ezekiel holds a very peculiar place among the prophets -- he is not what may be termed an evangelistic prophet. I think that Isaiah stands out as the evangelistic prophet. You will recall how the Lord, in standing up to preach for the first time, turned to Isaiah for His gospel text. I take it therefore that Isaiah has a peculiar place in that way; and you will recall, too, how the eunuch who had been up to Jerusalem to worship, returning in his chariot through the desert, also read the book of Isaiah, and how that Philip, who is the one man in all Scripture called an evangelist, began at the same scripture that the eunuch read and preached unto him from that scripture -- "Jesus".
Jesus was foreseen by the prophet Isaiah in a peculiar way; he says, "In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple", Isaiah 6:1. He records there the acknowledging of his sinfulness; there was ready to hand a means of cleansing, for one of the seraphim takes a coal from the altar, flies swiftly and touches the prophet's lips so that he was cleansed, and hence John the evangelist records that "These things said Esaias, when he saw his glory, and spake of him", John 12:41. John cites the chapter I quoted (chapter 6), and he quotes chapter 53 at the same time, and then he says, "These things said Esaias, when he saw his glory, and spake of him". It was through what we may call an evangelical prophet he announced the glory of the King on His throne, and Isaiah announced the moral glory of the same One, in His path of suffering love
in the world. "He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth", Isaiah 53:7. 'He was stricken', he says, 'for us' -- for the transgression of Jehovah's people. "Yet it pleased Jehovah to bruise him; he hath subjected him to suffering ... by his knowledge shall my righteous servant instruct many in righteousness". Isaiah 53:10 - 11 Such is the testimony, beloved friends, of Isaiah, the greatest of the prophets!
Now Ezekiel has another point of view. It is not a suffering Jesus, nor is it exactly Jesus on the throne; what he is pointed to is "the glory of the God of Israel".
Isaiah saw the glory of the Messiah, for His name signifies that He was "Jehovah the Saviour".
Ezekiel sees the: glory of God. The great counterpart of Ezekiel in the New Testament is Stephen, and, I may add, the counterpart of Stephen is Paul. Stephen sees Jesus in heaven "standing", he says, "at the right hand of God". Acts 7:55 Think of that! think of a man here looking through the heavens and seeing Jesus standing at the right hand of God. It says he saw "the glory of God and Jesus". Well, now, Paul takes that up and he is more explicit, he says it is "the glory of God in the face of Jesus" -- in the face of Jesus -- think of that, beloved friends. "God who spoke that out of darkness light should shine who has shone in our hearts for the shining forth of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ", 2 Corinthians 4:6. It is the glory here in Jesus there, the glory in Jesus, and it is revealed in the heart of Paul for the shining forth of it, he says. It shone down here, it was reflected down here in Paul, as he moved about among the nations, in a circuit from Jerusalem round about unto Illyricum. As he moved about in that circuit there was the reflection of the glory of God in the face of a Man in
heaven, shining out in that wonderful vessel. That is how Paul is regarded.
Ezekiel's great view is "the glory of God", so he says, "As I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God". When God gives us visions they are visions in regard of Himself -- visions of His glory, and the first chapter outlines a wonderful system -- wheels, and cherubs, and a man, and lions and oxen. An irresistible force going straight on (verse 12) and on the top of it, in the amber spot, "the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it" (verse 26). That was what he saw, and then he describes the man and the description is none other than a description of the Lord Jesus -- he began with his loins upward and from his loins downward. In that way He is a Man in the supreme place, who has got compassions. As the apostle says, "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the compassions of God", Romans 12:1. They are expressed in a Man -- every divine compassion found its expression in that Man. This description, as I said, is from the loins. The loins are a well-known seat of the lower affections -- there are higher affections connected with the heart, but what men need first of all are not those higher affections, but the lower affections that we get in the epistle to the Romans. "The compassions of God", that is what men need to begin with -- you need compassion -- God has had compassion on man -- he needs it.
Referring back to Romans 12, the writer says, "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the compassions of God", in other words, it is the measurement downwards, it is God, in His compassion, going out to man. In Luke 7 "He had compassion" on the widow. Now, if you compare Luke 7 with John 11 you will see the difference. It does not say He had compassion on Martha and Mary -- no. He loved them. That is the higher affection -- from the loins up. John
11 opens with the statement, "Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus" (verse 5). Hence, death having come in and broken up the circle, He must break death. He groaned as He approached the grave of Lazarus, but that groan meant that death must be annulled, it was a scene befitting a power that could annul death. That word 'groan' implies the deepest movement of His being; He felt the power of death for those He loved -- what a comfort for christians! and He looks at death in the way it affects us. He went into death and broke its power because He loved us. "Our Saviour Jesus Christ, who has annulled death", 2 Timothy 1:10.
Luke 7 gives us the lower affections; 'compassion' and 'love' are two different words, hence Luke says He was moved with compassion for the widow. He does not give us her name or her son's name, she is a widow and had an only son. A widow represents poor, needy, sin-stricken humanity. Are you aware of the ravages of death? Have they come home to you? Men shut their eyes to it; where death occurs all kinds of things are brought in to minimise its awful effect. In regard of the house of Jairus, the ruler of the synagogue, there is a little girl of twelve and she died. Death enters that house, and Jairus goes to the Lord and the Lord follows him to the house -- think of that! The Maker of the universe following a man to raise his little girl. That shows the compassion of Christ, but, when He went in, what did He find? "the tumult, and them that wept and wailed greatly", Mark 5:38. They were there to minimise the awful effect of death, they were making a tumult. The Lord says, 'I cannot help you now, you must remove the flute-players'. I use it as an illustration of how death is sought to be minimised by contrivances that Satan has devised. We must confess that God has brought home the ravages of death to mankind in a way He never did before. One can
well understand the expression, "O death"! Luke says the Lord was moved with compassion for the widow, it was the lower affections. God's compassions are towards all men. He has compassion for everybody; He had compassion for the widow and He has compassion for you, and as it says in Romans 3:22, "righteousness of God by faith of Jesus Christ towards all" -- it takes in every man, every woman and every child.
Do you know Him? The christian knows Him; he knows how He has met him in his need, how he has peace through the blood of Christ, how the Holy Spirit has been given in the same connection, and then, as the scripture says, "his compassions fail not; they are new every morning", Lamentations 3:22. Brother, do you know that? The freshness of divine compassions every morning -- that is to say, God taking account of us in the needs of our bodies, and there are fresh mercies every morning.
Ezekiel sees, in this chapter 8, when he was sitting in his house -- it is well that a man should learn to sit in his house -- godly men know how to sit in their houses and look after their families. Ezekiel was sitting in his house, and the hand of the Lord fell upon him. The elders of the people of God were there -- that is a good point, and then, as it reads, "the hand of the Lord Jehovah fell there upon me". In his house with the elders of Judah -- what must Ezekiel have been saying to them? Ah! he was a man of God, he would talk to these elders as to their responsibility. You know, that is what men think of least. Someone was saying to me yesterday: an unconverted man was speaking to him just yesterday, and saying how he had been ill, and he said, 'You know, when a man is ill, he begins to think'. Yes, but perhaps you never shall be ill; you must begin to think under other circumstances besides illness God would have you think -- "Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation". 2 Corinthians 6:2
God is speaking to you now, it is for you to think; and so the elders of Judah would suggest this responsibility in figure. What about your responsibility? You may say, 'Well, I have my family, and my business'. Yes, what about your soul? There is a well-known instance of a man who had much wealth through business, through the fruits of his lands -- "much goods laid up for many years" -- he had provided for many years, as men do. Sharp businessmen look ahead to see how the markets are going, but when God comes in, what about his much goods? "Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee". Luke 12:20 "Thy soul" -- not your wife, or your children, but your own soul shall be required of thee, you have got to give it up. That is your responsibility. It is the beginning of your responsibility -- when God speaks to you, you yourself, must repent. The responsibility is individual. The house is divided -- the husbands and the wives cannot repent together, they have got to do it separately. The question of having to do with God individually is a most important thing. One has to learn to enter into his closet, and shut to the door, to be alone with God. And so, in regard of your soul, it is an intensely individual matter between yourself and God.
Ezekiel the prophet says, the hand of the Lord Jehovah fell there upon me that was remarkable, and "the Spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heavens". You get a fine view of things, a grand prospect, as you are lifted up between heaven and earth. I have no doubt that the tabernacle is a figure of the firmament between the heaven and the earth -- it was there that the Lord was; and the Lord of glory, the Lord Jesus Christ was lifted up -- He was lifted up from the earth. He died between the heaven and the earth, He was a spectacle for the universe to see. Have you seen Him? -- the Lord of
glory, hanging between two malefactors, for you. He says, "I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me", John 12:32. But then it adds, "This he said, signifying what death he should die". It was the death of the cross. He was lifted up from the earth. Have you seen Him there? As you see Him there you are drawn to Him -- the prophet is taken by a lock of the head -- one would feel that, and he adds that he was brought to Jerusalem. The Lord wept over Jerusalem. "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets", showing, as here, that her sins had mounted up to heaven, and God took account of them. And now, how about you tonight? What about your sins? What about them? They are all known to God, in citing that passage I cannot but finish it, "how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" Matthew 23:37 So we see Christ showing His compassion, "and ye would not"; and so it is with every one of us who rejects, and holds himself back from the Lord Jesus, rejecting the overtures of Christ, "ye would not!"
The prophet is shown a wonderful thing, he says "and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy". Now, how is it, beloved friend, in regard of that gate in your heart? Is there a seat there for the image of jealousy? Now, God, in making you, had in mind that that heart was to be for Him. What is in that heart? What is in it, as God looks into it? "Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts", Matthew 15:19 that is every heart naturally. Is that the state of your heart? or, has the Lord opened it? I often think of that dear woman called Lydia, who lived at Philippi; she was an Asiatic, but she lived in Europe and the Lord opened
her heart -- the Lord did it. There are things we cannot do, and what we cannot do the Lord does; what we can do, as His, He leaves us to do, hence "whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul", Acts 16:14. Paul spoke the things but the Lord opened her heart. One seeks that the Lord may open hearts; I know, no matter how one may speak, if the Lord does not open the heart the door is shut. Take heed how you believe and what you hear. If the Lord opened your heart He wants you to hear the things spoken by Paul -- that is the gospel; let the light of the gospel shine in.
Ezekiel saw "the seat of the image of jealousy" it may be in your heart tonight. That secret idol would make God jealous of your heart because He wants you. Every true christian here tonight loves God, and it is said of those that love God, "all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to purpose", Romans 8:28. A whole number of things working together for good -- we do not appreciate that but it is so. Things that may seem adverse are all working for your good because you love God, and He would have you love Him so that the light of Christ should come into your heart. Is the image of jealousy in your heart? "And, behold, the glory of the God of Israel was there", it was alongside the image. The glory of God is, as it were, beside you. Think of the grace and compassions of God going to where that idol was! He allowed his glory to be there. Later on in Ezekiel he says, "there was only a wall between me and them", chapter 43: 8. There is no more between God and you, the glory of God is here.
There is not anything that I am more sure of than that "the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ", 2 Corinthians 4:6 is shining in His people here today. There is only a
wall between you and them. The glory of God was there alongside the image of jealousy, the grace of God can come near in His people.
In chapter 9 the glory had gone out to the threshold -- and I would warn you that the glory is about to leave, and the opportunity will be lost for ever. Give up that image of jealousy which disputes the rights of God in your heart! There is nothing more beautiful than the face of Jesus and the glory of God is in it -- it is imperative for you to turn away from that idol to "the glory of God, in the face of Jesus Christ".
In chapter 9 the judgment comes, and you will notice that the destroyers come in by the way of the upper gate. Judgment comes from heaven, it is a terrible thing to have to say that it comes from heaven -- it is overwhelming. I think the deluge was a great type of God's judgment; "the windows of heaven were opened". Genesis 7:11 Everyone was engulfed in the presence of that awful deluge -- it destroyed them every one. No one lived, except eight souls in the ark. What comes from heaven is overwhelming and so I would warn you tonight to take advantage of "the glory of God" and the outstretched hand, now. He is waiting on men to bless them, but when these six men come down there is no escape. Ancient men, young men, women and children, there is no escape whatever for the wrath of God is terrible, beyond my power to express. These men are sent with slaughter weapons in their hands, but there is the other side for your encouragement. The man with the inkhorn was among them -- he was not out of sympathy with the men with the slaughter weapons, nor is any true servant of God with a right judgment. Not that the christian hastens judgment, but he knows it has to come and he is in sympathy with it. Hence Romans teaches us that "the wrath of God is revealed from heaven", Romans 1:18, It will be overwhelming
when it comes. This man with the inkhorn is clothed with linen, he is pure and holy, and he has got an inkhorn by his side. He goes out and he takes account of every person that sighs over the abominations of Jerusalem. It may be that you attach but little importance to that sigh that you give expression to, as you take account of the abominations that exist in that which bears the name of Christ in this world. God takes account of it, that is an indication that there is something of God in you -- it is there and God knows it, so he says, "Go ... through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof" (verse 4). Now, that is a word of encouragement; anyone that sighs or cries for the abominations that are done today in that which bears the name of Christ shall not come into judgment -- not one -- "and, behold, the man clothed with linen, which had the inkhorn by his side, reported the matter" (verse 11). There was a report made, and I would say for your encouragement, if you are wont to sigh and cry for the abominations that exist, the mark is put on you, and I would say that you may do more than sigh and cry -- the next thing is to leave the place. "Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity", 2 Timothy 2:19. Have you done that? It is a serious thing to be found in a place where abominations exist. The New Testament shows you what to do -- withdraw from the midst of it -- and there is a very beautiful word of encouragement. "The Lord knoweth them that are his". 2 Timothy 2:19 It corresponds with this passage, the man knew those that sighed and cried and so the Lord today knows those that are His, and those that are His feel, in some measure, the evil. I want you to more than feel it, I want you to act on the scripture which enjoins, "Let everyone that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity". Leave the place. You
say, 'What am I going to do? Am I going to be isolated in the world?' No, you do not need to be that, "follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart", 2 Timothy 2:22. Not only those who sigh and cry, but those "that call on the Lord" and what does that mean? "Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved". Acts 2:21 These people know deliverance every day for they "call on the Lord out of a pure heart". They are the ones to be with.
J.T. It is as well to remember as we had last evening that the things treated in the gospels had already become known. They were written to show the settings of them from the divine standpoint that the saints should be in sympathy with God in what He was doing.
This gospel presents the beginning of the gospel so that the believer is arrested as to what part he has in it. The Lord would bring us into a sense of levitical obligations in regard to it and this gospel is peculiarly fitted to bring about the levitical family and to bring about the recognition of levitical obligation, and that each should take his place in regard to the service.
W.H. Is that in the Lord's mind when He says, "Come after me, and I will make you become fishers of men"?
J.T. Yes. It shows how the levites were brought into the service, and the apostles brought into it so that all should follow -- so that they should enter levitical service. They were with the Lord a considerable time. After this chapter is the place of active service; that is to say, from the time they are called they are serving the novitiate, the five years. They would observe the Lord, how He did things.
W.H. So that Mark says, "that they might be with him".
J.T. Yes. Now they are to be with Him in the mountain -- called apart.
G.N. Is levitical service in this gospel universal?
J.T. Yes, I think so, preaching.
Rem. So that "do the work of an evangelist" 2 Timothy 4:5 would be applicable to all of us.
J.T. Yes. In the first chapter the Lord attacks the enemy in the religious sphere and the household sphere, and He returns to the synagogue; He enters it again. At His first entrance He overthrew the power of Satan. Now He is going to take a man out of it that He can use, hence it is his right hand that is withered. He is going to employ us. And so He heals a man. Hence the man's hand is restored.
A.R. Is levitical service preaching, did you say?
J.T. Yes, it is the leading thought in this gospel.
A.R. Would you confine it to that?
J.T. No. All saints are levites. You see this third chapter is dealing with a special class of preachers. All are not preachers, neither does the assembly preach. So that this chapter calls attention to a class specially employed in the preaching.
G.N. It is the twelve that are singled out here.
J.T. That is what it develops into; but He goes up into a mountain and "calls whom he himself would" and He appointed twelve. This principle of sovereign selection is important. Peter's house had a condition that would hinder service; it was fever, but there is also the man himself in his house. It is how he is to be in it. That is chapter 2, where he has power in his house. It might not cure fever in the house but the power in which the man is set in his house would enable him to hold it for God. It says, "passing by, he saw Levi the son of Alphaeus sitting at the tax-office, and says to him, Follow me". "And it came to pass as he lay at table in his house" -- the Lord was in his house.
Rem. This house then becomes an evangelical outlet to the world.
J.T. That is what you get. Many were with Jesus at table. Levi brought in his own class.
G.N. Levitical service would be dealing with a moral state.
J.T. Would you enlarge on that?
G.N. Well, we generally take priestly service as dealing with a moral state.
J.T. The point in Mark is how things are done, do you think? The priest is the sympathetic side -- that is Luke; but the skill is seen in the levite. So that we have "He hath done all things well".
G.N. Hence the necessity of being with Him.
Ques. Do you suggest that the power of evil may be dispossessed and a brother still have a withered hand?
J.T. Yes. The withered hand means he is not available for work, so that the second chapter adjusts one in regard to one's circumstances. Love is sympathetic. But there is another thing; we have to learn what new things are, because coming out of the synagogue one would carry the old things. Hence we have seen the gospel carried on in the old way, not according to the new methods. So that the Lord, before He healed the man, brought out the fact that the things had to be new. He says, "No one sews a patch of new cloth on an old garment: otherwise its new filling-up takes from the old stuff, and there is a worse rent. And no one puts new wine into old skins; otherwise the wine bursts the skins". Mark 2:21 - 22 It is the Lord's way of doing things and that has to be noted. So that the man whose hand is withered has to learn that if he is in the Lord's employ he must work on new principles.
G.N. So that every case would require new and special skill on the part of the levite.
J.T. Yes, a certain newness in the levite working in the power of the Spirit.
Rem. You would see that in Philip joining himself to the chariot.
J.T. Philip knew what to do. In Samaria he preached Christ because the Samaritans were under the influence of national feeling, and they had not come to it, that one Man had done everything; and
that delivers from national feeling. It conveys the idea to you that one Man, Christ, has done everything so that all men would be indebted to this one Man. That overthrows all feeling. And then to the eunuch he preached Jesus. I do not suppose that he had any pride in his nation; he was a coloured man, but it was a great thing that a coloured man should know that Jesus was a Man as he was. He saw that Jesus was a Man, for Philip would enlarge on the humanity of Christ. He preached Jesus; you must begin at His birth, for that is the history of the Man. "He shall grow up before him as a tender plant", Isaiah 53:2 that is what he was reading and that won his heart so that the levite knew what to do. He might have said 'the preaching in Samaria was very effective and I will preach it here'.
Rem. That indicates the skill of the levite.
J.T. Yes, the thing is to be ready to have something new to meet the person where he is. He began at the scripture and preached Jesus. I think from the whole of the book of Acts we get the levitical skill working out. The first is Peter's sermon at Pentecost; he stood up with the eleven, and that meant that they were all preachers.
- .S. Is there an analogy between the priest and the levite now?
J.T. It was the priest who regulated the levite.
G.N. Luke's gospel presents the Lord Jesus as priest on the extrication line. "That we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies", Luke 1:74 and all through the gospel each incident is extrication.
J.T. Yes, it is more sympathy in Luke. He had compassion. The Acts appeals to one in this sense. Peter acts in the intelligence of a levite in standing up with the eleven and so after chapter 13 we have the full height of levitical intelligence presented in the apostle Paul. The Spirit says, "Separate me now"; Acts 13:2 the time had come for it. Paul had been
working in Antioch for a whole year and working effectively, too. That is the five years' novitiate. But they were not at full levitical maturity until chapter 13. The Spirit says, "Separate me now". They had come to the age of thirty and the choice is amply justified in the fact that they return to Antioch. The choice of the Spirit was justified in that their work was done, they completed the work and they fulfilled it. The idea of a levite is to finish things; the Lord finished His work. So during that tour Paul comes to Antioch in Pisidia. He does not stand up at once. He sits down amongst them until he is asked to speak and then he speaks. The levite knows. He has levitical wisdom and in speaking he says nothing to irritate. There are many other instances. When he went to Philippi he sought out the prayer meeting before he preached. He found certain ones there praying and he sought them out. When he went to Thessalonica he went in "among them" before he spoke. These are hints as to levitical skill in service.
G.N. In the type the levite received his instruction from the priest so that the apostle would be first priest and then levite.
J.T. Yes, that is the order. That five years in Numbers is very important because you see how other people act then. You will have observed in your own way how you have been helped by seeing how brethren did things. It is "Remember your leaders". Hebrews 13:7
W.H. At Antioch there was a priestly element in operation.
G.N. So an old brother is not to be despised for he has experience.
J.T. Yes. So you have Peter alongside. Peter is preserved. Herod would kill him, but Peter was a man of great experience with God.
W.H. Is the skill you speak of a gift or the result of experience?
J.T. It is experience. Men with great gift employ sometimes human methods, but experience with God excludes all that.
G.N. So that in the conflicts we pass through we should gain experience and pass it on.
J.T. Yes. Young people may have gift and energy, but they cannot have experience; hence the importance of leaders.
Rem. That shows the wisdom of God in setting the young and the old together.
J.T. Yes. It is the twenty to fifty years. There is a time when the Holy Spirit indicates that a brother has a certain line of work to do, and it has to be done.
G.D. Do you think that the writer of the gospel moved out too soon?
J.T. Yes, but he came to it afterwards. It says afterwards "he is profitable to me for the ministry". 2 Timothy 4:11
G.D. His time with Paul and Barnabas would be a great lesson to him.
J.T. Yes, there is a time when you get knocked about; you are not yet a journeyman. During the five years you have to take a subordinate place -- you are not thirty yet. One learns this in those five years, that things are not done on old methods.
W.H. Do you think you get in Barnabas a recognition of the skill when he went to seek out Paul?
J.T. Yes. I think he saw in Saul the right kind of man. In Acts 9 he came in among the disciples and then he entered the synagogue and preached that Jesus is the Son of God. He joined himself to the disciples not as a distinct vessel but as one of them. He was to be subordinate in Jerusalem. All these things happen, he comes to Jerusalem, works for a year, and is not recognised, but he is working; and he is not yet recognised -- it is Barnabas and Saul. He has to win his spurs, so to speak, and presently it is Paul and -- Barnabas.
Rem. So that in the day of ruin you would be very glad to do anything.
J.T. Yes. You do not give up the thought that there is a levite and a Prince of the princes of the levites. You look to the Lord to give you His own line. We are told just what they did; they went out preaching everywhere.
A.R. Is that what you meant last night when you said that levitical work is not local?
J.T. Yes, the levites' work is general and so the Lord had established the principle of newness and the third chapter brings out a state of things so that the old regime had to be given up. No doubt, reluctantly, but he takes out of it what is usable, and this man can be used. A man with one hand is awkward. He was not altogether useless.
J.C. How do we find out what work the Lord would have us to do?
J.T. The great levite Paul said, "Lord, what wilt thou have me to do?" Acts 9:6 That is one thing. The next thing is that you work away at what you find; he just did what was to be done. Barnabas brings him to Antioch but that was not a levitical appointment. Barnabas saw that he had a heart for the service, but he does not yet get his commission. So one has just to move on humbly doing what is to be done at the time, looking to the Lord, and you will find that you are in a certain line of things. You may have desire and the Lord has respect for any desire but you find that you become effective on a certain line.
G.N. We must have no assumption -- the apostle came amongst them.
J.T. One has not to go far. So that at the end of the year the Spirit says, 'Separate me Barnabas and Saul, I have another work for them'.
Ques. Do you think that a good deal of our
discipline comes in to teach us that the man must be greater than his service?
J.T. I think that is important. Every levite is a first-born, so the book of Joshua helps greatly.
Rem. You would not use the service to distinguish yourself. It is to distinguish Christ.
- .S. So this man with the withered hand is typical of the first man?
J.T. Yes, it is any man working in a religious way.
- .S. Would it suggest the recovery of Israel?
J.T. I have no doubt in the future, but if you notice he says, "Rise up and come into the midst". The Lord would show what He is doing and all see it. The Lord calls the man out and heals him; He gives him power to work -- to work according to God. Thus things begin to take a new form; the old methods depart. The Lord proves that He has a right and calls whom He will so that, after all, my service is given to me of Christ. He takes them away from the noise of the crowd up the mountain and one has to apprehend the Lord there, to be with Him there.
Rem. He calls to Himself, whom He would, so that we have not only to be with the Lord but to recognise the sovereignty of His choice.
J.T. Yes, that is what comes out here. You will observe that whilst they are with Him on the mount they are not yet put into service. It is one thing to go amongst the saints and to do what comes to your hand but another thing to get a distinct word from the Lord as to what you are to do and take your bearing from that point of view. Thus another course of instruction comes in and that is in chapter 6: 7. You have levites entering on their service and what they do -- they leave anointed ones behind them. They would be witnesses, they "anointed with oil many infirm". The anointed one is a witness.
A.R. Would that be in the apostle's mind, when
he said to Barnabas, "Let us go ... and see how they do"? Acts 15:36
J.T. Yes. It was his thought that souls should not only be saved but set up as witness. All this sets aside modern evangelical activity.
Rem. You get that in chapter 5 -- the demoniac is left behind.
J.T. Yes, the Lord leaves us as witness. If it were for the satisfaction of His own love he would take us to be with Himself.
W.R. Why does Mark record the Lord's command to have a staff and sandals? Luke leaves that out.
J.T. They were to go forth in experience. The staff is experience and the sandals help you in regard of the earth and your walk.
W.H. In the middle of chapter 3 he comes to the house. What is the instruction in that?
J.T. You find that the house is a place of affection and the Lord would be available there to people. That would be now in the assembly.
1 Corinthians 1:9; 1 Corinthians 10:15 - 22; 1 John 1
J.T. I suggested these three scriptures to give us the three features of fellowship. There are three features and they stand out. First: we are called to the fellowship of God's Son, that is the dignity of the fellowship; second, the fellowship of His death involving the exclusiveness of it; and third, with one another involving the personal distinctness of each christian. The Lord would have us to understand that we are called to something very plain. He reminds the Corinthians in this chapter and later that in visiting Corinth He did not take up the nobility specially: He had no thought that what was great in this world would add anything to what He was instituting so that Paul says, "For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called; but God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; and base things of the world, and things that are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are; that no flesh should glory in his presence. But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption: that according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord". 1 Corinthians 1:26 - 31 That is God served notice at the outset in Corinth that He had no regard for human greatness or distinction. What would be great in His order of things would be for Himself, so all the believer requires is that Christ is made to him wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption so
that we are set up independent at the outset of the world's greatness. So that it is nothing to us. And so, in calling us into this fellowship it is the fellowship of His Son and no fellowship can be greater than that. There are fellowships in the world sometimes distinguished by great personages at the head of them but no fellowship can be compared to the fellowship of God's Son. It is well, for young people particularly, to notice this because there is a danger of young people becoming scandalised (as the word is) by the cross, stumbling at the outward smallness of the things of God: so that God gives us to know that these things are not really small: they are infinitely great.
Rem. Do you think that we are fitted for the position by what we have set forth in what Christ is made to us?
J.T. Yes, we do need wisdom there, and we do need righteousness and sanctification and we do need redemption.
Rem. So we get that at the beginning.
J.T. Yes, in Christ -- a subject that is to be worked out later. But you are completely equipped at the outset. God has made Him to be that to us, knowing what was requisite for His own system of things; hence God has made Christ these things to us and that is encouragement for the feeblest believer.
Rem. That is a contrast to weak things.
G.N. Would you say that the Corinthians had departed from the dignity of the fellowship? They were reigning like kings.
J.T. Yes, exactly. The apostles were the full expression of the thing, it was what God had made them. The Corinthians had departed from that.
Rem. So in the thought of fellowship you have no public distinction in this world.
J.T. You have to become a fool to become wise, weak to become strong.
G.N. I suppose there is great moral dignity in that in itself.
J.T. Yes, it is only as being great, as being truly great, in the light of Christ, that one can be truly small and so when the apostle came to Corinth he set aside all that would distinguish him naturally. He was a man of great learning, a man of celebrated ancestry, a man religiously without blemish, but instead of capitalising these things he lodged with poor people, tentmakers, not because they were christians, but because they were of the same craft, showing how completely he was identified with small things in this world.
I think it is dignity here. In the light of John 9 and 10 we know what the Son came to do. He sets up a system of His own; He builds the house and is over the house; but for the moment it is simply the dignity of the thing because the Corinthian saints were not equal to the truth of the house, to the truth of what the Son would do.
Rem. Would it help us if we saw that the present is the time of fellowship?
J.T. Quite. There is no need for it in the millennium because there is nothing adverse.
Rem. Would it call for sympathetic feelings in relation to what is before the Son?
J.T. Yes. It is a great thing for young believers to see that they are called to what is so dignified. It is before God you need dignity.
J.F. Is the idea of fellowship that we have a common interest?
J.T. It would amount to that only I think it is the character or distinction -- that He gives character or distinction to the thing. We are part in that. The principle of fellowship is joint partnership, involving obligation.
A.A.T. Is fellowship for the present time?
J.T. Yes. We shall not need it in the millennium,
but in chapter 1 here it is the dignity attaching to it.
G.N. Would you say a little more as to the dignity? Has it any outward aspect at all?
J.T. Well, it is well illustrated in the tabernacle. The outward appearance of the tabernacle was very insignificant. What you would see would be some badgers' skins or rams' skins, everything speaking of death outwardly, but inwardly there was dignity. Before God there was dignity. There was essential greatness before God.
Rem. Do you think the outward results flow from that, but the thing itself is not for the public eye?
G.N. You take the tabernacle as a figure here, because it needs to be viewed as in the wilderness?
J.T. Yes. It was set up by the apostle Paul. He began as a tent-maker; he was there eighteen mouths, we are told, teaching the word of God, meaning that the thoughts of God came out and through the apostle's service they were put together in the saints. They were made to stand together in relation to God and one another. That was the thought, so that God was known there of a truth; there was the Jew, the gentile and the church of God. The church of God was that in which God was known, but outwardly it was a very insignificant assembly.
Rem. I suppose the beauty of the tabernacle was only inside?
J.T. Yes. If you went to the meeting at Corinth you would not find the elite of the city there, but if they were there they would not be there in the light of their own dignity but of what God had made them in Christ. You would find in that assembly the bulk of them poor and despised. God deliberately selected them. Just as the tabernacle was made of what was insignificant in itself, so he chose what was insignificant in Corinth and set them together to be known amongst them. Anyone sitting down there would see the
saints sitting together and would recognise that God was there. Although it was outwardly small God Himself was there. That is the thought. God would impress us with His own greatness. He placed Himself in grace within the reach of all and that gives the assembly a wonderful place, and hence the importance of understanding fellowship so as to preserve it intact and keep out evil. The moment evil comes in, God has to go out. You cannot have the two together. Hence chapter 10 is to show that the fellowship is the fellowship of Christ's death. The apostle takes them up on what they were doing there.
- .W. What is the force of being called?
J.T. The word 'assembly' implies being called out. The gospel reaching you in the world implies that you are not to stay there. 'Not only is this a wicked place', He says, 'but I have something infinitely better for you'.
Rem. Abraham was called out. Here it is called into. That is more positive.
J.T. Yes. But it refers to your being called by the gospel because it really is the gospel of God's Son.
Rem. Do you think the curtains suggest the thought of fellowship?
- .L. Outwardly they were held together by links of brass. Is that the Corinthian side?
J.T. The first vessel is brass as you approach the tabernacle, meaning that in God's enclosure there must be the constant persistent judgment of sin. The brazen altar stood right in front as you enter the gate and the fire was burning there all the time. We must be there according to what God is in Christ.
- .L. Would the curtains held together by links of brass be Corinthians and the links of gold John's epistle?
J.T. Yes, quite. There was the love of Christ at Corinth; I mean although they were loose and allowing
evil they were christians. They were said to be babes but they were babes in Christ.
A.A.T. Were they in fellowship?
J.T. They were called into it, you see. He addresses them as intelligent persons and in addressing us in this way it is to bring home to us the necessity for consistency in what we do. They bless the cup and break the bread and now he says, 'what you are doing is that you are publicly committing yourselves with your own hands to the death of Christ: and what then are your outward relations?'
- .W. Is that why the faithfulness of God is brought in?
J.T. I think the faithfulness of God is the background to fellowship. There is no excuse for saints to be found in evil associations. God will support you in giving up the evil associations.
- .L. Is the thought in Corinthians that you do judge it?
J.T. You have to judge it for if you do not you have to do with the Lord and you are not stronger than He. Those that are not consistent are contending with the Lord.
Ques. Is that the reason why he says in chapter 11 that many are weak and sickly among you and many sleep?
Rem. Does chapter 10 bring in the responsible side?
J.T. Yes, chapters 10 and 11 both do.
Ques. The first chapter is a question of purpose, is it not?
J.T. It is the privilege side, what God is doing, but chapter 10 is what you are doing. You are blessing the cup and breaking the bread and he points out that what you are doing is in connection with the body of Christ. The apostle is combating what has now become a huge system in the world.
And it opens the subject as to what the Lord will do. What we need to pay attention to is chapter 10. It is a question of our public associations and the Lord is against all evil associations.
- .L. Would it be correct to say that outwardly we walk together in the judgment of evil?
- .L. Would that be the brass?
J.T. Yes, and there are boards all round and God is with us in that way. Outwardly we present another attitude towards sin. As God said to Jeremiah, 'You are like a wall of brass against the hardened Israelites'.
Rem. The Lord's death is the solution of the question of good and evil.
J.T. Yes, but the point is that in the divine precincts there is no tolerance of evil.
Rem. Christ has suffered that evil might be removed so what a serious thing it is to tolerate what He suffered for.
A.A.T. Is this judgment maintained by the assembly?
J.T. Yes, by the assembly, but each individual maintains it for himself.
A.A.T. But the instructions are for the assembly.
Rem. We have not the assembly now.
J.T. But we have the light now. God has brought to light the great principles that govern fellowship. There is one body, one Spirit, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, and that means that there is universality in our relations. There is only one fellowship, and the principles that govern it have been brought to light. And the question is, How am I taking them up? We read in the Song of Solomon, "We have a little sister, and she hath no breasts"; that is, her affections are not
developed but still she is a sister, in family relationship. "What shall we do for our sister in the day when she shall be spoken for?" We must speak for our brethren even if undeveloped and the question is, "If she be a wall, we will build upon her a palace of silver": that is, if she has the principles of fellowship with her, the principles that would exclude evil and preserve good. If she have not loved much she has begun to refuse evil and maintain good. Now you cannot build unless the wall is there. That is the principle of exclusion of evil and the maintaining of good. "If she be a door, we will enclose her with boards of cedar", Song of Songs 8:8 - 9 that is, we will dignify her. "I" is the thing, so if the saint is that you can take him on and build on him.
Rem. That takes in your associations.
J.T. Yes. It is in the light of the death of Christ that you can refuse. You have the power in your soul and the Holy Spirit in you enables you. You begin with yourself. "If ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live". Romans 8:13
-.L. So that in the outward court it was brass right the way through, and was not the effort of the apostle in 1 Corinthians to bring the saints there into accord with brass?
J.T. Yes, quite. In chapter 13 he speaks of love. In chapter 11 he brings in the love of Christ but it was to beget love in them. I was thinking in regard to principles being recovered of what some of us were speaking of with regard to the type in Leviticus -- the type of leprosy and the cleansing of leprosy. It says, "If a sore of leprosy is in a garment, … or in the skin, or in the warp, or in the woof". Leviticus 13:47 - 48 In ordinary cloth it is in the warp and woof. I referred to it so as to see that if we do not apply the principles that govern fellowship, the leprosy will be in the warp even if you put in a good weft. Even if the weft be clear the leprosy is there. The apostle was there
eighteen months teaching the word of God. It involved laying down definite principles for them: and what kind of warp did he put in for them? Now the warp is that part of the cloth laid on by him and it runs the entire length of the cloth, the weft is what is put in by hand -- it is what I do, my daily experience and practice. The apostle says, "I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth". 1 Corinthians 3:10 The apostle laid the warp for them and he says, 'You have to put in a good weft'. They put in leprosy: their conduct was not right: they had an incestuous person with them. Their practical conduct was leprous.
Rem. Principles bring forth a generation in accord with themselves.
J.T. Well, I think principles have been recovered to us. The truth of the house of God came out and was refused by a great many brethren. They lost, and God has ever since been asserting those principles: and brethren brought into the light of them, coming into fellowship as we speak, are really in the position of putting in the weft. And so the principle involved is that there is only one Lord, and the fellowship is one -- the fellowship of His Son, of His death; therefore it includes all the saints in the world.
Rem. So that even in the day of ruin those principles remain.
A.A.T. Here it is as if Paul had acted in chapter 5 and explains his action in chapter 10.
J.T. He is trying to get them to put in the right weft. This man has to go; he is not suitable for fellowship.
- .L. Would you say that we get the test of what the weft should be in chapter 10?
Ques. Would you say a word as to the distinction
between the fellowship of the blood of Christ and the body of Christ?
J.T. The blood is the love of God to us, I think; the blood represents the life. Think of what a life that was for God! From its very inception to its end it was wholly for God, and God gave that up. He gave it up in love that we might live, and are we going to live a different life from that? The life of Jesus is to he continued -- "That the life also of Jesus may be manifested in our mortal flesh". 2 Corinthians 4:11 God will have no other life than that but it is recovered for the eye of God and I drink into that. It is a question of consistency; the body of Christ is that there was a vessel for God's will here. I was saying the other evening, "In the volume of the book it is written of me". Psalm 40:7 I am admitted into that -- "The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?" There was a body here for God's will and I commit myself to that so that he says, "For we being many are one bread, and one body". I think we should well note the remark "in the volume of the book it is written". There was that which was delightful to God.
G.N. So that the Lord felt being cut off in the midst of his days.
J.T. You see how it is connected with the volume of the book in the breaking of the bread. The question is what is my body connected with? Can I wear a badge? Can I be linked up with a society in this world? I must use my body if I do; and therefore all one's relations are tested. It is the bread which we break. Moreover I am connected with the Lord's people: the "we" there is the 'we' of universality; I am linked with all the saints. We cannot be partakers of the Lord's table and the table of demons.
Rem. Before you come to Corinthians it is supposed that the body is presented already, that is in Romans.
J.T. Well, Romans runs alongside Corinthians; it makes you a board in the tabernacle. We are set up in relation to one another in the assembly; Romans is the kingdom and this is the assembly. It is that in which the order of God is to be seen.
Ques. And what about John's epistle?
J.T. John brings in the persons; it is persons we have fellowship with. And who are they? "If we walk in the light ... we have fellowship one with another". John brings in the personal side. Each saint is personally interesting to me; it is not with this saint or with that saint but with any saint. He is personally interesting to me and if he is walking in the light and I am walking in the light we have fellowship one with another. Corinthians is 'of' but John is 'with'. That suggests persons. It is with the Father and with the Son that ye also might have fellowship with us and with one another.
- .L. That would be the golden links that bind us together -- the links of affection.
J.T. Yes, that is a very good distinction. It is a terrible thing if I do not want a christian. I want the saints with me, so he has raised us up together and made us to sit together in the heavenlies. Love values that. It is terrible to think that I would make up my mind to get on without the christian company; it is the opposite of love.
- .L. Fellowship would be impossible without the others.
J.F. What is the condition, "If we walk in the light, as he is in the light"?
J.T. In John it is movement. Walking in it is that I move myself in it.
Rem. You reap what is the result of consistency when you come to John.
J.T. Yes. Look at the number of persons you have to love. Love is the one thing that stands by you; it never fails.
Rem. So that in a day like the present we would feel the loss of many of our brethren who are not available.
J.T. I do not think that we should be content until we get them. Keep on looking for them.
A.M. So Abraham looked towards Sodom.
J.T. Yes, and he armed his trained servants to rescue his brethren. He is a fine example of one in fellowship. I think it is very fine to dwell on Paul's attitude towards the Corinthians. Whatever their attitude towards him, his attitude was the same towards them. There are many to whom you cannot speak because of their attitude. "O, ye Corinthians, our mouth is open unto you ... . Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers". 2 Corinthians 6:14 Enlargement spiritually and an unequal yoke cannot go together.
Colossians 2:6 - 19
J.T. What came to my mind in regard to the subject before us is the fact that the Colossians had love. It says, "the love which ye have towards all the saints". That is in a certain sense the key to this epistle. Both this company and that at Ephesus had love.
G.N. That would be the atmosphere of the christian circle -- that is what you get in Colossians?
J.T. Yes, that is in the company who had love as a common thing; as the Lord said, "have love amongst yourselves". John 13:35 I have been thinking lately a little about love. The Lord speaking in Spirit as Wisdom in Proverbs, says. "… that I may cause those that love me to inherit substance". Proverbs 8:21 The Lord here in all His movements was marked by wisdom. Those that were drawn to Him would see not only beauty -- His personal beauty, but that wisdom was there, and love begotten by wisdom. He ensures a condition of things that is wholly in accord with the mind of God. Wisdom having been with God at the outset in everything that was done, is now with Him in what He is doing. The Lord says, "My Father worketh hitherto and I work". John 5:17 It was there in Christ from the outset, and those who were about Him loved Him in that way, so that the love that is amongst us is or should be marked by wisdom; in Colosse the fact that they had love afforded the Spirit of God the opportunity to bring in certain things in regard to Christ as Head. The Spirit had liberty to bring in Christ in a personal way, because love appreciates the personal touch. Moses from the outset was a remarkable man personally, but his personality would be
largely hidden behind his officialism, he was an official as representing God. But at the end of the wilderness his personal touch is seen in a particular way. God says, 'Now you have got to go up and die'. 'Well', he says, 'put a man over the people which may lead them, that they may not be like sheep which have no shepherd'. He loved the people and God says 'there is Joshua, he is a man who has got the Spirit'. The going in is a spiritual matter, and you have got to change from Moses to Joshua: He is not going to lead them in, but a man is going to lead them in who has the Spirit. It is a spiritual thing, and so Moses writes all these words, that is the whole book of Deuteronomy, thirty -- four chapters, all to the end that, although he is not going to take them in himself, they should go in suitably. It is not here the official, it is the man himself, because of the affection which he shows for the people, and his thought is that they should go in suitably, that there should be no discrepancy between them and the land which God had given them, so that the personal touch comes out at the end. It corresponds in my mind with John 14, in which the Lord prepares a place, a new order of things.
G.N. Do you mean that the children of Israel journeyed with Moses by the instructions he gave them, but the crossing of the Jordan was a matter of affection?
J.T. Yes. The fact that the Colossians had love among themselves, induces the Spirit of God to bring before them certain features which were yet lacking, because we may have love and yet certain features be lacking.
Ques. Would authority be set forth at the Red Sea?
J.T. Yes. It is the rod of Moses there.
Ques. Would authority be connected with light and what is personal with love?
J.T. Yes. It is love that makes way for headship.
Rem. So that Romans would be light, while Colossians would be love.
J.F. Why do you connect Colossians with this point in the history of the children of Israel?
J.T. Colossians is the place where the saints are entering the land, and so corresponds to Deuteronomy. Deuteronomy is as far as Moses can take them, he is practically head, but he is not Joshua. There is that which you need as preliminary education on the other side of Jordan. It is not a question of one's place in relation to the tabernacle. It is no question now of the public order of Corinthians, but how you are going to be in the new order of things where Christ is. One may behave fairly well in the light of Corinthians, but when you come to Joshua -- to Colossians, it puts you to the test. How are you going to do in an order of things where everything is governed by divine wisdom, wisdom being the handmaid of love? He says here, "As therefore ye have received the Christ, Jesus the Lord, walk in him". I think it is very essential that we have love among ourselves, and that we have love towards all the saints. It is not simply that I love those that are local, but all the saints.
C.P. It is a vital thing in the assembly. What our attention is being called to is vital to us. It is not knowledge.
J.T. There is one great danger, and that is localism. You may have order, and the Lord may be adding, and we begin to think of ourselves in relation to what we have locally. The Ephraimites seriously threatened Gideon, that is they were local, Gideon was general, he says, "Is not the gleaning of the grapes of Ephraim better than the vintage of Abiezer?" Judges 8:2. He was not occupied with what he had.
Rem. So that God would lead us on to what is universal.
J.T. "The love", it says here, "which ye have towards all the saints". If any came there, whether they came from Jerusalem or Thessalonica or Corinth, they would all find the same thing. There would be no preference or favour to the one from Jerusalem. They would think equally as well of the Thessalonian, because they had the thing there that was general or universal.
Rem. I suppose the danger of being local is that there may be rivalry as between localities.
J.T. A real danger, and one has seen it. This love among ourselves towards all the saints, I think, is the safeguard to that.
G.N. If we are taken up with what is local we might stop short of what is the purpose of God.
J.T. I think we stop growth. Growth is in relation to the whole. The Lord is Head of the body, now if I am local unduly I stop that as far as I am concerned, because the nourishment comes from the head and the body grows proportionately. You would not like to see the right hand longer than the left.
Rem. From whom the whole body is fitly joined together.
A.F. Headship is universal. We ought to be on the line of headship.
J.T. Yes. This instruction is very important because the two -- and -- a -- half tribes had already decided that they would not go over. They had not love among themselves. In fact what they thought about was their cattle. Love among yourselves does not include cattle.
Ques. Do not you think that is a real danger at the present time?
J.T. Certainly. The king of Sodom says to Abraham, you take the goods and I will take the persons. It is the persons you want, love for persons.
The two -- and -- a -- half tribes had made up their minds, they would be content without persons.
Rem. They would be earth dwellers.
J.T. Yes. Where he mentions the love on account of the hope which is laid up for you in the heavens, that is the love that the saints have. The love of God is shed abroad in my heart by the Spirit, that is the wilderness side of Jordan, because the Holy Spirit came in in the wilderness. If he begets love, as He does, shedding the love of God abroad in my heart, it is in relation to the hope, and the hope is for all the saints. When I think of the hope I do not think of local assemblies at all. He does not present assemblies to Himself. Assemblies are provisional. They are like gardens. "My beloved is gone down into his garden ... to feed in the gardens", Song of Songs 6:2. He has got his garden; it is general -- but then there are gardens. Gardens may be used to illustrate assemblies -- the provisional thing, but that is not connected with the heavenly hope.
C.P. In Numbers God speaks of the people as gardens by the river's side.
J.T. That is it. He does not present assemblies to Himself. He presents the assembly to Himself because that is the end of the thing, the primary thought.
C.P. Gardens are on the wilderness side of Jordan.
J.T. That would be like Corinthians. Corinthians is assemblies and the Lord comes to them to feed in His gardens. There are no assemblies in the heavens. There is one assembly there.
G.N. What is meant by changing over to Joshua? Is Joshua a type of the Spirit?
J.T. He is rather a type of Christ in a spiritual way. It is what the Lord is as having passed out of this world altogether. What He is as risen and gone on high is a spiritual thing. He comes in in spite of closed doors. The authority of the Lord requires that there is one door in the room. A man shall
meet you with a pitcher of water. That is his interest in you. Follow him and enter where he goes. There is only one entrance, and the clock has to do with that -- "when the hour was come". Luke 22:14 The time of day has to do with that and all public things, but the Joshua side, the spiritual side is "the doors were shut" John 20:19 not 'door', but "doors". The Lord comes in, in spite of closed doors. That is to every saint, as it were, there is a door.
C.P. You are not speaking of Joshua as the one who leads them over, but what is true of them on the other side. Is he a type of Christ as Captain of our salvation?
J.T. He is more. In leading many sons to glory, He is the Leader of our salvation.
Rem. So that Moses would represent lordship, while Joshua would represent headship.
A.S. Was the apostle's distress for the Colossians personal or official?
J.T. I think it is apostolic there. His thought was to present every man perfect in Christ. It is like Moses in Deuteronomy. He would present every Israelite, as it were, perfect. I was saying in reference to the two -- and -- a -- half tribes that they had made up their minds that they were just going so far. It is not that they did not have love. They had it as the others, but there are many of the Lord's people who make up their minds that they will go so far and no further. Earthly possessions detain them. "We have much cattle", Deuteronomy 3:19 they say. They are detained by the providences of God, in fact by what they should have offered in sacrifice.
G.N. When you come to the side of Christ as head, it is love that answers to that, you love the Lord.
J.T. The woman in Luke 7 anoints His feet. She saw that those feet had carried Him into the world, and she does not mean to detain Him in the world. After the resurrection they held Him by the feet but
that was unintelligent. Mary of Bethany anointed His feet. It meant that she saw that He was going out of the world. "Against the day of my burying hath she kept this". John 12:7 And so Mary Magdalene in chapter 20 -- she wanted Him, and He pointed out to her, 'if you are to have me, you must be in correspondence with me'. So He says, "Touch me not". John 20:17
R.N. So that love would delight to answer to that.
J.T. Quite. I do think that this determination today to go to a certain point and not go beyond it, is a very serious one. You maintain distinctions, whereas over Jordan there is no distinction. It is "in Christ Jesus".
Rem. I suppose the danger of these things is that they are all legitimate.
J.T. Well, you can go on with them with a good conscience. Here were two -- and -- a -- half tribes with spiritual advantages and yet they made up their minds not to go any further. They would go over to fight, but only for a short time. They wanted an altar set up, but it was not for sacrifices. It is like a brother saying, 'I have got property and a large family. I want to live on my property and in my family, but I want to maintain my place among the saints, I can go in at any time and take part with you. But I am not at home there, my home is elsewhere'. It was not a right thought for them to set up an altar. It was just to notify the ten tribes that they had a right to the land, but they were not taking it up.
G.N. Lordship is connected with the wilderness, and headship with the land.
J.T. Moses went as near headship as he could, because it is not the official Moses. "These are the words which Moses spoke" Deuteronomy 1:1; it is not 'Thus saith the Lord', but "These are the words which Moses spoke"; it is his own personal desire for the people, and that desire was according to the Lord, he loved the people.
F.W. Is it only earthly things that would detain one from going over?
J.T. I think that it would be that generally. I do not think that to emphasise the local thought too much would rob us of the general thought. It is not so many assemblies in the heavens. It is one assembly in the heavens. He comes into His garden -- that is the whole assembly on earth. But He feeds in His gardens; he gets variety -- that is He is gathering lilies.
Ques. Is it occupation with the person: "as ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord"?
J.T. He begins with the state in you. It is not here, what is presented to you in the way of light. It is what you have received. That is, he begins with the subjective thing. You have received the Christ, Jesus the Lord. It is not the Lord Jesus Christ; that would be Romans, "put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ". Romans 13:14 That is the kind of garb in which you appear according to Romans, but here you have received the Christ, Jesus the Lord. That is, you have made a start, a very good start, and it is for everyone to see that you have made such a start.
Ques. What did you say 'The Christ' set forth?
J.T. The One who does everything for God.
G.McK. I suppose our exercises should be that the local is governed by the general.
J.T. You are in a way as interested in the saints in New Zealand, as in Glasgow, although you are responsible there. You keep it in relation to the one garden.
G.N. So the truth of headship would preserve us from being local. He is Head of the assembly. We all come under the same headship.
A.F. Do you make a distinction between coming
together in assemblies -- in Corinthians -- and one taking his place in the assembly?
J.T. "In the midst of the assembly will I sing thy praises" Hebrews 2:12 -- I think that is the general idea, because Hebrews contemplates the whole -- "whose house are we". Hebrews 3:6 Although he is writing to the christians in Judaea it is "we". This house includes all christians. It is the general idea in Hebrews throughout. The breaking of bread begins in New Zealand or Australia, thinking of the order of the day. It goes on the whole day till perhaps eight o'clock; you will pardon my simple allusion. You know the Lord comes into His garden, the whole assembly is before Him if He comes in. He comes in, in relation to the whole, but then He has His gardens. He has His special gardens in which He feeds. It is most interesting that the breaking of bread runs on to eight o'clock in the evening or may be longer as the sun goes round.
C.P. What about the gathering of the lilies?
J.T. That is what the saints are. Gathering lilies is a beautiful thought. He feeds among them, and then it says He gathers them. He has His own thoughts about you. He has got His own thoughts and He will bring you to these thoughts. He is gathering the lilies; He is not gathering up the worthless of the earth but what is valuable in His eyes. He says "Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these". Luke 12:27 The saint today has got more glory than Solomon. If God so clothe the grass -- it is what God does, the Lord is looking for those who are divinely clothed. I think that Colossians is to bring us up to that.
G.N. Why is circumcision and baptism brought in?
J.T. All these are to bring us into correspondence. It is His circumcision, There was handwriting, now
handwriting stands out against you and that is known and recognised. That could be disposed of by no one but Christ and His death.
Rem. I suppose one accepting baptism in the Colossian sense would be able to go on his way rejoicing.
J.T. The eunuch would love to be in the company of that Man, would he not? "Concerning whom does the prophet say this? of himself or of some other?" Acts 8:34 Philip began at that scripture, and announced unto him -- Jesus. He is willing to die with Him and he goes on his way rejoicing. He would be quite a Colossian saint.
Rem. That is the point of view here, and the eunuch illustrates it. You get the Spirit in the next chapter.
G.N. Movement would come in there. It is movement of the affections.
J.T. It is remarkable about that eunuch. There is an angel, and there is a eunuch and a man comes miraculously and he is taken away miraculously. He is born in spiritual circumstances, in heavenly circumstances, he is really begotten in the heavenlies. "The hope which is laid up for you in the heavens". Colossians 1:5 He went on his way. He was going to Colosse and he finds his way. You have to find what that way is. Colossians are entering; it is not in the land. You are still on the way and we must take note of that. You are going into the land -- God's land. If you are over Jordan in the conflict, you do not go back to Moab, you go back to Gilgal.
Rem. The eunuch was not going to be detained by the plains of Moab.
J.T. No, he went on his way happily. I believe he got in his soul the thought, 'I would like to be with that Man, His life is taken from the earth, and I do not want to be in life here'. Your life is hid with Christ in God. The man disappears. We know
no more of him. In John 12, at Bethany they acted rightly. There is no word as to the Lord telling them what to do. It is all what they did and the Lord accepts it. The conditions were there in a way -- six days before the Passover -- there they made Him a supper. Martha serves, Lazarus was one who sat at the table with Him, but Mary anoints His feet. The Lord accepts what they did.
C.P. The conditions were there -- they loved Him.
J.T. And their conduct was quite in keeping with Bethany, but there is something beyond Bethany. In chapter 20 it is not a locality. I think chapter 20 is the climax to the instruction which began in chapter 13.
W.H. So that the Supper would be connected with what is local, the assembly would be abstract, it would not be local.
J.T. The assembly would be connected with John 20; chapter 13 would be the local thing.
Rem. You would say that the experience of John 20 would be like Paul in the third heaven. You do not know whether you are in the body or out of it.
J.T. The Lord said to Mary, "Go to my brethren and say to them, I ascend", John 20:17 as if He were going at once, and she goes to the brethren, and He gives a heavenly visitation.
G.N. Where would you put the company in the end of Luke?
J.T. That would be more the Pentecostal company, the public thing. That is, Luke presents rather the public side. The Spirit comes upon them there, whereas in John He breathes into them.
John 8:12; John 20:21,22; 2 Corinthians 4:10 - 12
Life is what I had in mind to speak about tonight -- not in an exhaustive way, for the subject is very large, but in order that, by the Lord's help, we may see how it works out in the individual and how it works out in a locality, that is, collectively.
This thought came into my mind in coming yesterday, believing that, as in all cities in which saints reside, the subject of life, spiritual life, is of prime importance.
The Lord would have us in the light of life which comes to those who follow. He says that those who follow shall not walk in darkness but have the light of life. That is, the light of it as it shone in Him, for it is said, "In him was life; and the life was the light of men". John 1:4 So that life is a great thought, an extensive thought, an eternal thought, for it was promised before the world, and has taken form so as to be intelligible, so as to be within the range of man; it was to be life for man. Now, as I said, it was a great thought. God introduced it on the third day of creation. He gave life, or the possibility of it and we know that the stars were set in the heavens as guides. They differ, it says, in glory and their glory is obviously not of life (of that we know nothing). One star differs from another in glory, and the most glorious star, I suppose, of all was that seen over the manger by the wise men of the east and no doubt they suggest to us the benefit of the stars. They said, "Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east" Matthew 2:2 -- His star. So that would emphasise, beloved brethren, the value of these bodies. God made them and they are lights and
they are glorious. That surely is a wonderful thought, but the saints on earth are vessels of glory. Vessels of mercy fitted for glory are greater objects of interest to the spiritual mind than the stars of whose substance we know little. But we do know that God brought in life on the earth on the third day. As he bound the waters of death -- limiting them, the dry land, we are told, appeared. From the ground God caused to grow herbs and trees "yielding fruit". Genesis 1:11 - 12 So that the thought of life came in early. And then, on the fifth day, as you remember, He created the creatures, calling them living souls. Those records were written long after man was made, long after God was known to him in measure, so that those who had faith would read them with interest for they were not written for the curiosity of man. "Whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning". Romans 15:4 We have the record of the third day and the fifth day, and then on the sixth day we have the greatest testimony to life of the creation formed -- man. What interest it would afford to those who had faith when the record was first written and read. "Let us", says God, "make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion…" Genesis 1:26 And then so as to bring the great testimony before us more clearly, the Spirit of God turns to it in the second chapter without referring to the day, and we have man made after the likeness of God, by His own hand. "Formed" -- beloved brethren. "Formed" is not only the idea of creation but of making and the making brings in wisdom and skill. So that he was a figure, before God, of Him that was to come. God, "breathed", as it is said, "into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul". Genesis 2:7 The breath of God: who can say what a breath that was: who can define it? God breathed into his nostrils. God did it. It is a divine transaction of the most intimate nature and here we have man and
he is called by the Spirit of God "a living soul" -- made to live with an upright countenance, with a countenance that could meet God's countenance. As the psalmist of old said later answering to the thought, "The salvations of his countenance". That God should breathe upon a man, in the apprehension of the psalmist, meant salvation. Moreover, he says, "Who is the health of my countenance, and my God". Psalm 43:5 So that God and man, in the apprehension of the psalmist, met together and man was in health. It is said of the Lord in spirit, He "is white and ruddy" Song of Songs 5:10 the perfect expression in a man of energy and life. The psalmist apprehended the spiritual thought; others may dwell on the material. What we are concerned with, beloved, is of the Spirit, "God is a Spirit". John 4:24 God has revealed Himself in Jesus as a Spirit and He is to be known and worshipped "in spirit and in truth". And so the testimony of life was there. The figure of Him that was to come had appeared and the Holy Spirit, from that time, had in view the One who was to come. One was to come, as John says, "by water and blood". "This is he", he says, "that came by water and blood ... not by water only, but by water and blood" 1 John 5:6 -- as if John's epistle would place the water first and I have no doubt, beloved friends, that the import of that is that knowing redemption we neglect the water and hence we deprive ourselves of the enjoyment of life. We may take up the blood and neglect the water, but John says, "He that came by water and blood". And so the first name that Adam gave, after the figure of redemption, is Eve -- "the mother of all living". Genesis 3:20 That the word 'living' should be in the mouth of a man who had been pronounced dying "dying thou shalt die" -- is a wonderful triumph and, dear brethren, it should be in our minds as well as in our hearts for God has in view a living race -- not a dying race. He has no pleasure in a dying race. He
has got pleasure in a living race for He created the earth to be inhabited by a living race, and hence the Son came "by water and blood". From the divine side, He came by blood and water. As John says in the gospel, "forthwith came there out blood and water". John 19:34 If I were preaching the gospel, I should preach the blood first; if preaching to christians, I should preach the water first.
Well, now, the Lord, having all these things in His mind and having in His ministry, according to John's presentation of it, brought in the great principle of life, new birth, the lifting up of the Son of man, the fountain of living water, the raising of the dead, the living bread, and the gift of the Spirit, introduces His great subject -- "the light of life". I put it to you this evening, dear brethren: where are we in regard to the light of life? We cannot go on happily and spiritually if we are not in the light of life. If I have got the light of life, I am not going to live in circumstances of poverty or servility or mere outward form and mere doctrine or the most correct form or order of doctrine. I want to have the life. "I am come", He says, "that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly" John 10:10 -- plenty of it -- that is the thought. What a divine thought is abundance! Look anywhere you please in the world and there is the witness -- even as it is, and what shall it be in the future? -- even as it is, there is a witness of the bounty of it -- the plentifulness of it. So the Lord says, "I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly". Where are we, therefore, as regards this? The Lord came and where are we as regards this abundance? Well now, He says, he "shall not walk in darkness". If there is a christian here who is linked up with any association in which there is no freshness, he is walking in darkness to that extent. If I am in any association that is not marked by the
evidence of life then I cannot say I am walking or following Christ -- walking in the light of life. If I have got the light of life, I shall seek out where it is and I am not left in darkness as to where it is. This life, says John, is in His Son. There is no question about that. God has set life there. But then, I have another thought and that is that there is a circle of life. God is not now cultivating the ground. The time is coming when there shall be the evidence of God's blessing in material things and men shall sit under their fig trees like Nathaniel, when the heavens shall hear the earth and the earth shall hear the corn, the new wine and the oil, and they, as it says, shall hear Jizreel. Israel shall have blessing in abundance. The heavens and earth reunited shall afford abundance on the earth -- heavenly blessing on the earth. But God is not cultivating the earth. Alas for any christian who is cultivating the earth today! Cain cultivated the earth but the first man with faith (according to the record of Hebrews) was occupied with living beings. You may say they were sheep but they were called living souls, and he with faith takes account of the living souls. One of those sheep, in the eyes of Abel, was sufficient as a sacrifice. He offered an acceptable sacrifice. A sacrifice (how little he understood it!) which really meant the Lord Jesus. Faith had a person in view and that is a principle. We are not cultivating the earth. I am only referring to principle and I hope to show that the Lord would have us to cultivate one another. You see it is life in persons that God has given now and so if I have got the light of life it is life in a Person. We shall see the thing extended presently, but, for the moment, it is life in a Person. Think of the One who sat just as He was on the well; He came there; it did not alter His circumstances -- just as He was. He came so as to be within the range of a poor soul. "If thou knewest", He says. What words
these are! "If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink". John 4:10 "If thou knewest the gift of God". What words these are! One's heart is detained in the presence of such words as these. "If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink", then you would be able to appropriate what has become so available. Think of that: He came within her range and she talked to Him and then she talked of Him. Oh, I am sure that if we talk with Him, we shall talk of Him. Well, in that way, the life has come within our range. Hence I think of Jesus. If I am to apprehend life, I think of Jesus. I see, therefore, life within my range so as to contemplate. "That which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes; that which we contemplated, and our hands handled, concerning the word of life; (and the life has been manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and report to you the eternal life, which was with the Father, and has been manifested to us:) ... And these things write we to you that your joy may be full". 1 John 1:1 - 4 The life has come within our range. Do we contemplate it? "He that followeth me" says the Lord, "shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life". What are our associations -- religious? political? social? What are they? We test them by the light of life. If there is no spiritual life there, abandon them for ever. No one in the light of life could abide where death was, where death could reign. One has come into areas governed by death, a state of things in which there is nothing for God. "Thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead". "Thou hast a few ... they shall walk with me in white". "He that overcometh ... I will not blot out his name out of the book of life", Revelation 3:1, 4, 5. The Lord says to John, "I am ... the living one, and I became dead, and behold, I am living to the ages of ages, and have the keys of death and of
hades". Revelation 1:18 And hence the great truth of life, the importance of it when death is working everywhere, prevailing everywhere. The Lord would have us in the light of life and to walk in it; not to walk in darkness and where people profess to live and are dead.
Well now, I want to show how the thing works in an individual. It is said in John 20, that having said these things, the Lord breathed into them. There is to be life there, life like Jesus' life. The life is to be like His. It is not simply that I am a living soul but my life is to be like His, for God has His standard. "If these things are done in the green tree" -- Luke 23:31 -- there never was green like that before. The "green" in christianity is to be of the same kind, that is the life of Jesus. Hence the Lord breathed into them and says, "Receive the Holy Spirit". How wonderful that is. Think of the intimacy of the transaction. Think of the life and then the thought in it, not only that I should enjoy the thing but I should be that 'green' that God saw here in Christ, that I might go out in the spirit of Jesus for here it is Jesus Himself, it says, "stood in the midst". It is Man you see -- the last Adam, true enough, but nevertheless Man. He is a life -- giving spirit. But then it is a race of men on the earth like Him, connected with a company of people who have received the breath of Christ. Well now, the apostle had that before him. He said, "Always bearing about in the body the dying of Jesus" -- the dying of that Man. Why should that Man die? He died in love. It is a wonderful thing to see a man die for love, to see one surrendering himself to love, but think of the Son of God dying. Could anything in the whole universe be of more interest than that? How He died. I do not know how far back we might trace the manner of death. We may look back to the mount of transfiguration. "He stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem". Luke 9:51 He had just been talking about it on the heights. He
spoke of His decease and He goes deliberately down to die. If you trace that path you see how He died. What tender compassion for those who were with Him, and especially as we draw near and find ourselves in the upper room. He was dying in order that others might live; that is what He was doing and He was teaching us how to die, perhaps one of the most difficult lessons to learn. We have to learn everything from Jesus. It is only in the power of life that we can die. But the Prince of life died. Here it is His dying, and the dying of Jesus is what is so remarkable, and that is what the apostle says, "That the life also of Jesus may be manifested in our body". That is what Paul had in view. I take the apostle Paul to be the full representation of one into whose nostrils the breath of life had been breathed by Jesus. He received that breath. It developed in him until he says, I want to see a complete representation in man, as complete as it can be, bringing the thing down within the reach of us all. I want to see the life of Jesus in my mortal body. And then he goes on to say, "For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Jesus' sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh", and then the apostle adds, "So then death worketh in us, but life in you". Now what I make of that is, if you will bear with me, that life in any locality in which a man lives will be seen as the life of Jesus is manifested in him and he will help the saints generally. "We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren". That is what should mark a local company. I take Bethany to represent love in a locality. The Lord delights to come to a locality where love is. So He came to Bethany. Thus it is before the passover he came where Lazarus was, who had died. A risen man was there, and not only a risen man but persons who were affected by the testimony of life. They thought of
Jesus; they made Him a supper and Lazarus was one of those who sat at the table with Him, and Martha served and Mary anointed Him. There is not a word there as to their being told to do these things. It is the product of the light of life. Chapter 12 is, so to say, the product of the previous chapter -- the thing is allowed to be seen -- the light of life working out in a group, in a locality. The point is not the house, as you will observe. In Matthew and Mark we find a reference to Simon the leper's house but in John it is the locality. So it says He came to Bethany. He came to Bethany where Lazarus was. Lazarus was there and others who loved Him. The result of His ministry was that they gave of their own accord and He accepted it. It is true the house is referred to as filled. It is filled with the odour of the ointment. That is the thing. That is what the Holy Spirit would lead to. Readings and prayer meetings are all right but the point is, what is the benefit of these without the green evidence of life? That is what God likes and He will have it. If there is one who is in life, that one has to learn locally to lay down his life for the people -- "death worketh in us, but life in you". It is a poor thing if I am enjoying life at the expense of another brother. God would have me to enjoy it through my own exercises.
Exodus 20:22 - 26
In thinking of the material that is spoken of for the altars in this chapter, there is this particularly, that God reminds His people that He had spoken to them from heaven and that they should not make with Him gods of silver nor unto themselves gods of gold, i.e., there is a suggestion of respectable idolatry. However respectable the gods may be or seem to be, they are, nevertheless, idols, and to be refused.
God had spoken out of heaven, and had enjoined, early in the chapter, that He had rights over them which were indisputable. They had seen no form but had heard a voice and they were to be on their guard against idolatry -- a danger which is ever present even as we partake of the greatest privileges. As God may be pleased to address us in the most intimate way, the danger of the heart being diverted is ever present.
The enemy would suggest what is respectable; that which, in the world, would be regarded as of the first order -- gods of silver, gods of gold. These are what the enemy would introduce immediately after there has been a manifestation from God. God had spoken to them out of heaven, but the danger was present, nevertheless, of the heart being diverted by what would pass muster, in religious circles, as being respectable, and the Lord in proceeding brings in the idea of the altar.
I thought of this, dear brethren, as a line of preservation for us. You will observe that it does not say 'if' in verse 24, whereas in verse 25 He says, "If thou wilt make me an altar of stone". The altar of earth was imperative; the altar of stone may be
beyond us. The want of it does not unchristianise us, but no one can be in relation to God without the first. There must be an altar of earth. It is the means or guarantee of our security; it is the acceptance of divine provision and is the confession of our part in flesh and blood.
The altar of stone, I apprehend, leads us further and suggests that we have part in an order of things outside flesh and blood. This is a most wonderful suggestion in this particular phase of Israel's history, and if there is to be a recognition of their condition, they might go on to an order of things quite outside flesh and blood. If one might carry further or elucidate the truth opened up in this verse, one might refer you to the first epistle to the Corinthians; I speak of it tonight because of the need of each individual christian to be self -- sustaining and not dependent for his spiritual welfare on what the Lord may provide in the way of gift. There is the need for each christian to be self -- dependent, as it were. Not independent, surely, but able to live on in dependence upon God. Psalm 16 is an expression of the dependent man. It is not Christ in resurrection; it is Christ here in the place of dependence on God in acceptance of the conditions which He had taken up before God.
1 Corinthians 15:57; 1 John 5:4, 5, Habakkuk 3:17 - 19; Judges 4:4 - 6
I have before me, dear brethren, to speak about victory, and you will observe in the first passage read that God gives it to us, the 'us' obviously having reference to those having faith, for spiritual things are given only to such. God is bountiful in material things and provides for all, even although there may not be faith, for He has never left Himself without witness among men, giving rain, as we are told, and fruitful seasons, filling men's hearts with food and gladness. Indeed, as the passage goes on to say: "In him we (meaning all mankind) live, and move, and have our being", Acts 17:28. But when it comes to spiritual things the dispensation of God is said to be in faith. The gospel is addressed to those who have faith, as it is said, on the principle of faith to faith; it is an administration. The Lord Jesus Christ, ere going up to heaven, after He rose from the dead, moved in and out amongst His people for forty days, and in that way would impress them with what is spiritual, so that on going on high, being made both Lord and Christ, He administered what was spiritual. And so Peter says, referring to the gift of the Spirit which was there to be observed: "Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear", Acts 2:33. But He shed Him forth upon those who had faith. He, as shed forth thus, was available to man, but only on the principle of faith. So that what God gives spiritually, as I said, has reference to those who have faith, and when the apostle here says, "Thanks be to God who giveth
us the victory", the "us" refers to those who have faith. As having faith we believe what is presented to us on the principle of faith. And so, in this chapter, the apostle says at the outset that the gospel which he preached to the Corinthians was that "Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures". 1 Corinthians 15:4 These facts were presented to them on the principle of faith, and having received them (if they did, indeed) they came within the 'us', to whom God is pleased to give the victory. And, I may add, so that there may be no misunderstanding as to what this victory implies, that it does not refer to any material success or prosperity in this world. It refers to what the chapter speaks of; it refers to resurrection, and you will observe that he does not say, 'He shall give it to us', but He "giveth us the victory". In other words it is a present thing, which God intends should be by faith in the possession of our souls: He gives it to us, and He gives it to us through our Lord Jesus Christ.
Now, the Lord, as risen, remained with His own forty days before He ascended, and, as you will remember, He appeared, according to this chapter, on six different occasions; and I submit to you that on each of these occasions there would be conveyed the sense of victory. First, He appeared to Cephas. In the gospel of Luke we are told He appeared to Simon, doubtless to reassure the heart of His erring disciple, but the Spirit of God has not that in view in this passage, and so He mentions Simon's spiritual name. We have to understand what it is, beloved, to have spiritual names, because it is first that which is natural and afterwards that which is spiritual. We have to understand how we come under the eye of the Lord, the last Adam who is a quickening Spirit. If He has to do with us He quickens us; He quickens us in relation to His own perfect wisdom as to the
place we are to occupy in that spiritual world which He came to effectuate. So that Simon is referred to here according to his spiritual name. This quickening involves certain traits which no one else has. Each one differs, as this passage tells us: "Star differs from star in glory". 1 Corinthians 15:41 Each one has his own living characteristics, spiritual characteristics, and, as all come under the eye of the last Adam, He sees these and names the person accordingly. We shall all appear, therefore, in the spiritual realm according to the names which the last Adam confers. And so, as He appears to Cephas, there would be in the heart of Cephas a sense of victory. He would be stimulated in the sense of victory as to what he was and the place he was to occupy in the divine structure, for his name signifies 'a stone'.
And then He appears to the twelve, for they were to administer. There was to be here an administrative company appointed by the Lord, and they had been appointed, and as appointed He appears to them. The appearance would convey to them a sense of victory, for the One whom they were to represent in their administration was Himself supremely victorious; He was out of death. Their administration should be not of material things, but spiritual things, and they would be impressed by the appearance of Christ to them as the twelve, with the sense of victory: that they had to do with a spiritual Person. One who had been into death, and was now out of it. They would be impressed with victory, and would carry on the administration in the sense of victory; they would be above the least taint of corruption. We know how administrators after the flesh are exposed to corruption, but these would be set up in their souls in complete superiority in the sense of victory that the Lord Jesus Christ would accord to them as appearing to them.
Then it is said that He appeared to above five
hundred brethren at once; and here again there would be the conveyance to their souls of victory, for how should we maintain the truth involved in the term 'brethren', except as in victory? We should soon drop to the level of current religion around us unless we are in the sense of victory. It was as risen from the dead that the Lord Jesus Christ sent the message to His brethren. He says, "Go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God", John 20:17. "I ascend", He says, and how that would elevate their hearts far above this world, and the earth, and even the garden in which Magdalene had met Him. They were to be linked up with Him as ascended into heaven. He came in afterwards -- on what particular date I cannot tell -- but there were five hundred of them together at the one time -- a remarkable occasion -- and He appeared to them. Some of them, says the apostle, remained until that day. How those who remained, as moving about among the later converts would convey to those converts the dignity of 'brethren'! The term has been dragged down in our own times to the current religions in the world, brethren being classified among all the religions of town or country; but it was never so intended. The Lord's thought was that it should be elevated -- that we should remain in obscurity outside the range of man's cognisance. And so, these five hundred, as they moved about among the later converts, would impress upon them the spiritual dignity involved in the term 'brethren'.
And then He appeared to James, it says. We have in one instance His appearing to five hundred at once, and then again to one man. He would convey to James the sense of victory. Like some of David's mighty men of old, he doubtless had to confront many at one time, but God would give him the victory. I have no doubt that we should read the
history of David's men in the light of this, for, as the Lord would appear to an individual, He would convey to him that one man could chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight; as Samson says, "With the jawbone of an ass, heaps upon heaps, with the jaw of an ass have I slain a thousand men", Judges 15:16. A man who has had an appearing from the Lord is fortified in his soul with a sense of victory. It was not for Himself alone that He won the victory; that victory is to pervade every one of us! We are to be set up here in the sense of it.
Then He appeared to "all the apostles", as if to suggest to us that, if the authority of the Lord be called to question -- as, alas, it is -- the sense of victory which He conveys to those who represent Him in the world enables them to maintain it. To put it in simple language: "He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me", John 14:21. You maintain the will of God in your own path, and, as far as you can, in the meeting in which you are, at all costs. Not one iota of divine authority must be surrendered. His appearing to all the apostles has relation to His authority. They represented Him. His presence would impress them in this connection. They would be reminded of the spirit in which His authority should be maintained.
Paul said He appeared unto all these; then he adds, "And last of all he was seen of me", as one, we may say, who was intended to be a personal representative of His in this world; one who loved the Lord in a peculiar way. He says, "He loved me, and gave himself for me". Galatians 2:20 Paul loved the assembly, too, as he says, I will "fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's sake, which is the church", Colossians 1:24. How the beloved apostle Paul would be impressed with the victory of Christ as He appeared to him!
Well now, having said so much, I turn to the
passage in John's epistle, because it shows you how we come into this. First he says, "All that has been begotten of God gets the victory over the world" -- nothing else! You may study the Scriptures, and the writings that bear on the Scriptures, and acquire knowledge and ability to speak, but all these suffice not for the victory over the world. It is all that is begotten of God that gets the victory. And then again, he says, "This is the victory which has gotten the victory over the world, our faith". This is not only faith in your soul; it includes, I think, the system of truth unfolded in the Lord Jesus Christ -- the whole of it -- our faith. On every hand the truth is being given up and abandoned; who are abandoning it? Those who are not born of God, for those who are born of God get the victory, and they hold the truth. Later on we are told "the Spirit is the truth". Christ is the truth -- "I am the way, the truth, and the life". John 14:6 That is objective. He presents the whole truth of God objectively, but in the epistle the Spirit is the truth, suggesting that the Holy Spirit down here, in the believers, maintains the truth in complete correspondence with Christ in heaven; an immense thought! Can it ever fall to the ground? Never! "This is the victory which has gotten the victory over the world, our faith". It was held in the souls of believers. The truth was never intended to be maintained by catechism or 'articles of religion'. That cannot be called faith. The word suggests that things were held livingly in men's souls, and by the Spirit the truth was held in all its parts, as John wrote. And it was supremely above the world; it brought down the world, as at Ephesus; the books were burned.
I wish to convey to the young ones here what an immense thing we have, as we lay hold of the truth by the Spirit. "Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of
God?" I have already anticipated this: "Our faith" involves every christian -- the unity of the faith -- and wherever it is held in faith -- that is, livingly, in a man's soul -- there is victory. But then there is the individual thought: "Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?" The word 'overcometh' here is victory; "he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God" has it.
I commend, dear brethren, the importance of believing that Jesus is the Son of God. John presents Him in his gospel, and Paul preached Him as the Son of God. According to the Scriptures Paul was the first to preach that Jesus was the Son of God; you can understand it, for he had already the appearing. "Last of all … he appeared to me", 1 Corinthians 15:8 Paul said. "God", he says, "was pleased to reveal his Son in me, that I may announce him as glad tidings among the nations", Galatians 1:16. And so the preaching that has come to us gentiles is that; the preaching of the Son of God.
As it is individual here one would raise the question with everyone present -- the question the Lord raised with the man that had been blind: "Dost thou believe on the Son of God?" John 9:35 You see, John contemplates in his gospel that there are believers, and believers. He contemplates that many should come under the head of believers, or disciples, and yet not be believers in the Son of God. Indeed, the man in John 9 had already been a believer. He had witnessed for Christ, and, on account of his witness, had been cast out of the synagogue, and yet the Lord raises the question: "Dost thou believe on the Son of God?" You see there is a point we have to reach experimentally, when we believe on the Son of God. And so the man says to the Lord, "Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on him?" The Lord replies, "Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that
talketh with thee", and he says, "Lord, I believe". John 9:36 - 38 He is already outside the world, cast out; but I doubt that he had yet overcome it. The religious world had taken the initiative, and cast him out, but he would meet the world in other forms later, and he needed preparation for this. So the Lord finds him, and he believes on the Son of God. What does that mean? -- another world; the light of the Son of God in another world gives me the victory over the present one. So I would say to the young ones here, to consider what you have come into as having believed on Christ. It means another world: a world the Son of God has set up, and you have part in it; it is all before you. He says, "me and thee", and He would convey to your soul that it is just Himself and yourself; that is, He links you up with Himself, and you are His for ever. And the world? You disdain it! What has it got for you? Nothing! Paul said the world was crucified unto him, and he unto the world. He says, "God forbid that I should boast, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world", Galatians 6:14.
Now, I just wanted to point out in the two passages I read in the Old Testament how that the Old Testament confirms, and, indeed, enlarges on the New. It gives us illustrations, and so, in Habakkuk, you have a victor. If you go through his prophecy, you will see, at one time he was very despondent; things were not going well, and he is an example of most of us. We all have our despondent times, up to a point. I often think that the journey of young christians is, so to speak, undulating -- up and down -- and so it was with Habakkuk, until he arrived at the apprehension of what he speaks of: high places. He begins with variable notes, but he ends with a stringed instrument; I think it is 1 Corinthians 15. The choir, I think, is in view of these chapters,
beginning with the tenth, and when you come to the great truth of resurrection the strings are tightened up, the flesh is disallowed, and you apprehend the Man out of death; you are in victory. And so Habakkuk says, "To the chief Musician. On my stringed instruments". Whatever happened to the vines, or to the figs, or to the herds, or to the flocks, affected him not now. His business affairs might go against him, his family affairs, or what not, but now he would rejoice -- "I will rejoice in the Lord, I will joy in the God of my salvation". What is proposed in the gospel is outside of all these material things, and, as apprehended, makes you independent of them. Not that you do not feel things, but you are not dragged down by them; you walk in your high places. You see it is when God gives you the victory, and you are in it consciously, that the high places are yours. The Lord Jesus walked on the high places for forty days before He ascended so that His own might see what victory He had gained. The world saw Him not -- it was outside of this world -- but His disciples saw Him; He showed Himself unto them alive. He walked on His high places, but now the believer walks on his. He walks independently of adverse circumstances, as in the light of victory, in the light of Christ risen from the dead. God gives you "hind's feet"; you are above the pressure of this world, and you walk on the high places, and God gets His portion from you. I would that every one of us could use this possessive case, as indicating that we have entered on the high places trodden by the Lord Jesus Christ during those forty days. As the Lord took Peter by the hand, so He would take every one of us, so that we might walk with Him on our high places.
In Deborah there is an instance of one who has the victory in its bearing on the testimony here, because, after all, that is what God has in view in
leaving us down here. He could easily take us to heaven, but His thought is to set us up in complete independence of this world on our high places, so that we might be here in superiority to the world, and to present the gospel, the testimony to it. It is only in the good of the thing that I can commend it to others; it is not a system of doctrines or articles; it is a thing I have got. I am walking on my high places, and can impress others that the thing is worth having.
Well, now, Deborah judged Israel in those days, and they were dark days. She says, "The roads were unused, and the travellers on highways went by crooked paths. The villages ceased in Israel, ceased until that I Deborah arose", Judges 5:6,7. But how did she arise? "She dwelt under the palm -- tree of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel, in mount Ephraim". You see, she had a palm -- tree -- "the palm -- tree of Deborah" -- it was hers, the token of personal victory. How can I be a judge of any, unless I am personally victorious? How can I influence others aright, unless I am spiritually victorious? Deborah was victorious, as she dwelt under her own palm -- tree. As the Israelites came to her for judgment, they would be impressed with that well -- known symbol of victory. They did not need to carry a bribe with them to obtain her favour, as she needed no bribe; you could not corrupt her, for she was beyond it. She dwelt under her own palm tree, between Ramah and Bethel. You see, she is in good surroundings, with her own palm tree over her. And so any one of us who is in these circumstances can influence the people of God aright.
They come up to Deborah for judgment. And so one who is personally victorious is sure to have a place among the people of God. They respect you, and come to you. What an advantage to come to one who is personally victorious! What an advantage
to the saints to have one who lives near to God, and to whom they can come for advice! It is on this ground that eldership stands. How can one rule in the house of God unless he rules himself and his own house. As he rules himself and his own house, he is sitting under the palm tree of spiritual victory; he is beyond personal considerations, and is thinking of the welfare of the saints -- only that -- and the saints know it, and they come to him.
So they come to Deborah, and she sends for Barak, and says, "Hath not Jehovah ... commanded?" I only want to say that you see that one who is personally victorious is now concerned about the will of God. It is not a question of my will, or my judgment, although the saints respect it, as they did Deborah's, but her word to Barak was this: "Hath not Jehovah … commanded?" Victory in this sense is always marked by respect for the Lord's commandments, and that is what an elder would insist on, and what is of most importance to be insisted upon; for, everywhere, men are asserting their own wills, whereas one that is victorious spiritually considers for God. As the Lord said, "He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me", John 14:21. And again: "Hereby know we that we love the children of God, when we love God and keep his commandments", 1 John 5:2. The truly victorious person insists on the Lord's commandments.
Well, dear brethren, that is what I had on my mind tonight, and I hope the Lord will bring the thought home to each of us. He intends that we should each be in victory, as otherwise we shall not be available in the testimony.
I believe He is giving victory; I believe that God is graciously giving victory to the assembly, maybe in a small way outwardly, but, nevertheless, really, as in the case of Samson. There was not very much to honour Samson in his death, but he slew
more in his death than in his life. He had his greatest victory in the end; what was the secret of it? His hair had begun to grow; it had been shaven, but now there was evidence of life -- thus the victory at the end.
Exodus 3:1 - 6; John 1:14; 1 John 1:1 - 3
I wish to speak at this time, dear brethren, about spiritual contemplation, believing that it is a real need among us; especially among young believers, the ability to sit down as illustrated in Mary of Bethany is comparatively rare. In the Canticles the female speaker says, "In his shadow have I rapture and sit down". Song of Songs 2:3 Sitting down from this point of view, is a posture in which we can contemplate to advantage. Unless we acquire the habit as believers we shall not shine for Christ, for we shall not take in nor absorb something presented objectively which is seen in Christ. We all know the influence of atmosphere, how it affects us extremely, how particularly in inanimate things, the influence of environment gives character to them, as for instance, a flower. "Consider the lilies", says the Lord, "how they grow". Luke 12:27 They grow in an environment provided -- "they toil not, they spin not; and yet ... Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these". Yet they also have to be nourished from the earth, and so it is, dear brethren, that we receive from the earth, for we are to take root downward and bear fruit upward. The king himself lives of the field; that emphasises that we eat, for in that wonderful description of creation in Psalm 104, one of the many wonderful things we eat is bread to strengthen man's heart and wine to gladden it. These have to be assimilated, so that in taking in the word, as Jeremiah did, he said, "Thy words were found, and I did eat them". Jeremiah 15:16 Ezekiel, too, ate the roll. In eating the word thus it becomes, as it were, ourselves, as when the Lord says, I am "Altogether that which I also say to you". John 8:25 There is this, beloved brethren, that we
take in by our own act, and the effect of the external environment which is prepared of God in Christ in heaven. Now for these things we require to sit down; we require, too, the habit of sitting down in a special sense, and so I refer to the passage in Exodus, not that Moses sat down there, for the Old Testament is not the time of sitting down but rather standing. Our Lord Jesus Christ has led the way in sitting as in all else, but Moses turned aside to contemplate. I want young ones to take notice of this particularly. We come to meetings, and it is wonderful the provision God makes for us; they are a divine provision, but after the meeting is over we are tested. In many instances that which came into the soul and mind is lost ere we leave the room, but the idea is that we should retain it for an opportunity to sit down and contemplate. Now you see Moses came to Horeb, the mount of God, an excellent position. It is well to come to hear from God, it is well to be there. It is to Moses' credit that he led the sheep there, and that he came to the mount of God, as it is to ours as we draw near to hear the word of God, for ministry is intended to convey the mind of God, and it is well to hear it. Yet though the angel came, if Moses had not turned aside, how much he would have missed. He might have recorded what a wonderful thing he saw in the bush burning and not consumed, but I say, Moses, was that all? If he had not turned aside that would have been all. It says of Moses, he said, "I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt". He had determination to see the thing to the end. It was not a mere apparition but a sight and the Lord saw that he turned aside. God takes notice of the resolve of our hearts, and there should be resolution with us as the mind of God is brought to us. We are not worthy if we do not make resolutions.
The work of God proceeded in Moses' soul, so God
says, "Moses, Moses". In other words Moses is distinguished in this act. He could no doubt have occupied curious ears with it if he had not turned aside, but when one's name is mentioned twice one has distinguished oneself in the eyes of God, not of men, for no one was present when God said "Moses, Moses". There are several instances of this sort of distinction, as for instance Abraham when he offered up Isaac, Jacob when he sacrificed to the God of his fathers, Samuel, and above all Saul of Tarsus, and may it be said of each of us as we turn aside through special interest to take account of what God says to us, for we want it all. Think of God disclosing His mind to us, do we not want it all? Let us stop, dear brethren, to consider the wonder of it. Is it not worth thinking over, taking bit by bit, as it were; to understand, as He says, and know Me? (Jeremiah 9:24). Now the word is to Moses, "put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground". The mark of the Old Testament was, come not near, for the way into the holiest was not yet manifest, (Hebrews 9:8) but not so with us. However, we are apt to tread glibly on holy ground with our shoes on, but if we are to apprehend things aright we must see them in relation to Christ as He is before God. We are enjoined to draw near now by the new and living way; no more room for the flesh now than then, but there is a wonderful provision for us to leave the flesh outside. God enjoins us to draw near for love is intolerant of distance. I doubt much whether anyone enjoys relationship to God save he who enters the holiest. It is right to follow others, but a time comes when you have to go in yourself. Take off thy shoes for the place is holy; let us never forget; we are exhorted to be sober. Then the voice goes on, "I am the God of thy father"; you see, God would impress you as you draw near with His relationship to you, "The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ". Romans 15:6
The very lispings of the babe in christianity are in the light of the revelation of God, so that by the Spirit you cry, Abba, Father. You are in conscious relationship with God. You may say, my experience belies that, but I would say light goes before experience. The Spirit following light gives experience; be on your guard about placing experience before light. "I am the God of thy father". The Lord commenting on this passage makes it refer to resurrection, saying that God is not the God of the dead but of the living. He is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. That relationship can never be taken away; it stands for ever. In the opening of John's gospel we see one who contemplates Jesus as an only begotten. It is not now a burning bush. He says, "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us", many of us refer to that and rightly, but we overlook the next part, "and we have contemplated his glory". It is one thing to have the service but another to contemplate how He dwelt among men. John was one of them and he says, "we have contemplated his glory". It corresponds with what we call the holiest. "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us". They would see. You see if the Lord raised the dead, you say there must be something beyond that, and I want to see it; see what is behind that power. Nicodemus says no one can do these miracles unless God be with him; it comes to that, you reason backward, it is not of nature, so God is behind it.
They say, "we have contemplated his glory, a glory as of an only -- begotten with a father". King James' translators missed the point a bit, they say the Father, but it is not that quite. It is to bring it within the range of the youngest child, for everyone knows what an only one with a father is. The apostles saw behind the scenes, as it were, into the shrine. What reciprocated affections there are in such relationship as that! They saw how He spoke to God, His
emotion and the effect of the relationship. How much greater this was than the signs which everybody saw! The grace of relationship -- the grace of reciprocated affections -- and he adds, "full of grace and truth". So that while He is in relation to God, yet He is full of what man needs, and no one can serve unless he sees that in Christ. John had received of His fulness, and we must receive of it, "Of his fulness we all have received", the same grace and truth that is of Christ. Witness John's epistle and gospel as a proof of it.
Now I just want to bring out the thought of life -- "Concerning the word of life". Christianity begins with absolute perfection and all else is to come to that; hence, in the Word becoming flesh all is in perfection, and everything has to come to that. In the Acts the Lord presents Himself alive, that is, He placed Himself before their eyes, making it evident He was alive, and John says, our eyes have seen it and we report to you. He is qualified to be a witness. So the beloved disciple develops in his contemplation, he is filled and can bear witness. One of the greatest things in Scripture is the thought of witness, not only what one says, but what one is. Stephen is a striking witness; his address is a witness and he lays down himself as a witness; he was a witness. So John says, "we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son", and "we ... report to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has been manifested to us ... that ye also may have fellowship with us". So you see how by contemplating we bear witness to what we have seen, for we cannot do anything more. The thought is to bear witness to what we have seen. The need is great for quiet prayerful contemplation of what is presented and is coming out, so that we may be extending the things, on the principle of witness, "That your joy may be full". 1 John 1:4THE WILL OF GOD
THE WILDERNESS
THE BLESSING OF GOD -- HOW DISPENSED
LUKE WRITES WITH METHOD
GLORY OF THE GOD OF ISRAEL
LEVITICAL SKILL IN SERVICE
FELLOWSHIP
LOVE TO ALL THE SAINTS
LIFE WORKING OUT IN THE INDIVIDUAL AND IN THE LOCALITY
THE ALTAR OF EARTH AND THE ALTAR OF STONE
VICTORY
SPIRITUAL CONTEMPLATION